Re: [gst-devel] Totem or no Totem was Re: GNOME Development Series Snapshot 2.3.0: "Mighty Atom"
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: iain <iain prettypeople org>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Gstreamer-Devel <gstreamer-devel lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [gst-devel] Totem or no Totem was Re: GNOME Development Series Snapshot 2.3.0: "Mighty Atom"
- Date: 14 Apr 2003 09:32:56 +0100
On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 12:10, iain wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 12:03, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Oh, since when should we hold off onto giving a GNOME seal of approval
> > for a piece of software because one country in the whole world has a
> > different idea of what is legal?
>
> Spring loaded folders.
The issue is different in that one can pass on bundling Totem if they
are wary of possible legal problems. You would have a hard time if you
didn't bundle Nautilus...
--
/Bastien Nocera
http://hadess.net
#2 0x4205a2cc in printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity) from
/lib/i686/libc.so.6 printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity);
Segmentation fault
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]