Re: Adventures in GNOME... X Terminals A-Go-Go!
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Adventures in GNOME... X Terminals A-Go-Go!
- Date: 03 Sep 2002 12:11:06 +0100
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 08:52, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> This means turning off anti-aliasing, because XFT is client-side (fonts
> don't look so bad without it anyway).
Interesting; I've run Gnome 2.0 over remote X to a Solaris box and not
seen so much pain :-) but then perhaps that's down to expectations.
> It also means turning off Nautilus on the desktop, because the canvas is
> primarily client-side. Dragging windows around with Nautilus on the
> desktop hurts
You have full-window dragging turned on ? outline dragging should be
more painless, surely ?
> Menu icons are done client-side too, so if you turn them off, menus will
> be faster. They'll also be uglier and harder to read. ;-)
The thing is - that, as I see it the icon rendering should be purely
client side & push using X render, and not involve any round-trips. But
then again, since we create, populate and tear down ~2 XRenderPictures
per icon render - this doesn't seem like it's going to be all that
efficient; I'd be interested to know the roundtrip cost of that all.
Clearly - you need XRender on the client to enjoy any of the advantages
of that; do you have XRender on the client's X server ?
> - Choose an easy-to-render GTK+ theme
> That means low-pixmap count, and very few things to draw...
I'd hope that the theme would be using server side resources far more
heavily than anything else - and as such would not have any real impact.
Interesting results though,
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
] [Thread Prev