Re: libsn

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:15:44PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Havoc Pennington"/>
> > For startup notification I have "libsn" which is about 1000 lines of code
> > compiling to about a 20K binary on Linux/Intel.
> > 
> > It will be used by libwnck and metacity. It lives on
> > and has no dependencies other than Xlib.
> > 
> > I think we should just install it instead of cut-and-paste. Not as a
> > platform lib, of course. Opinions?
> Couldn't we just fold it in to libwnck for GNOME, or do you think everyone
> will be using it as a shared library?

It should be the same shared library for everybody: GNOME, KDE, and
every other group that want to use it. If you fold it in, it will be
hard to stay in sync (not to mention the duplicate code).


No one is listening until you make a mistake.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]