Re: that darned accessibility capplet

[Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>]

On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 18:43, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 18:12, earl johnson wrote: 
> > The new 3 tab designs you've worked up look good, I find them an 
> > acceptable solution:
> > 
> > http://www.gnome.org/~calum/accessx/accessx-3tab2-basic.png
> > http://www.gnome.org/~calum/accessx/accessx-3tab2-keys.png
> > http://www.gnome.org/~calum/accessx/accessx-3tab2-mouse.png

The last two should be

http://www.gnome.org/~calum/accessx/accessx-3tab2-filters.png
http://www.gnome.org/~calum/accessx/accessx-3tab2-mousekeys.png

I think.

I still think that calling the MouseKeys tab "mouse" and including a
link to the Mouse capplet would be an accessibility improvement.  We
certainly can afford the space now, and it's quite relevant to MouseKeys
users.

At the _very_ least there should be a reminder on the MouseKeys capplet
page reminding the user of where the other mouse settings are... in
which case putting a button there seems better still, despite the fact
that it's a bit non-standard.

-Bill
 
> Good :)  Although I've just learned that Alan Coopersmith wanted to keep
> Repeat, Slow and Bounce together because of their functional
> relationship... which is exactly how I did in the two-tab model, for the
> same reason.  *sigh*... 
> 
> Cheeri, 
> Calum. 
> 
> -- 
> CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer       Sun Microsystems Ireland
> mailto:calum benson sun com            GNOME Desktop Group
> http://ie.sun.com                      +353 1 819 9771
> 
> Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
>