Re: that darned accessibility capplet
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>
- Cc: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman sun com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: that darned accessibility capplet
- Date: 01 Oct 2002 16:23:35 -0700
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 15:47, Sander Vesik wrote:
> On 1 Oct 2002, Seth Nickell wrote:
>
> > > Cursor blink is an appearance characteristic, and is currently specifiable via
> > > GTK+ RC files (though I doubt that is the preferred way of setting
> > > this any longer).
> >
> > That its implemented technically as part of the GTK RC file is, IMO, of
> > little interest. EVERYTHING AFFECTS APPEARANCE, because if it doesn't
> > its not user visible and who cares anyway. Its an irrelevant argument,
> > the real question is where to draw the line.
> >
> > > Does it make any more sense to put it in 'keyboard' ?
> >
> > No, I think it makes sense not to put it anywhere.
> >
>
> Sorry Seth, but how are you going to justify this?
>
> Cursor blinking and / or its blink rate (and really also text cursor
> shape) is something that large amount of users are accustomed to
> adjusting, and its not really something specific to GUIs either.
I have trouble believing this (though I do know that *some* people do,
asking around various people I know, windows and linux users, I haven't
found anyone who changes the cursor blink rate). Having the blink rate
tied to a general "how much should the computer animate, blink, etc"
setting seems like a good idea, but I really don't see strong support
for having this preference.
-Seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]