Re: Removing gtkhtml2 view
- From: John Sheehan <John Sheehan sun com>
- To: Sander Vesik sun com, alexl redhat com
- Cc: bordoley msu edu, jdub perkypants org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Removing gtkhtml2 view
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:39:52 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Alex Larson wrote:
>
>On Thu, 16 May 2002, Sander Vesik wrote:
>
>> On 16 May 2002, Dave Bordoley wrote:
>>
>> > oops trying again....
>> >
>> > CCing desktop-devel. For those unfamiliar, we are discussing not
>> > shipping the nautilus gtkhtml view since it's pretty broken and buggy.
>> > Comments?
>> >
>>
>> The largest downside to not shipping it is that users will not be able to
>> view even very simple static html files residing on their local disk. Its
>> pretty unlikely that the 'view html source' is the behaviour they would be
>> expecting...
>
>We're aware of this. The two options right now are:
>1) Change default_action_type for HTML to application. Then you'll launch
>a web browser for html pages.
>
>2) I'm currently looking into a GtkHTML1 web view. It should be pretty
>simple, and GtkHTML1 is maintained. Although i'm not sure if GtkHTML1 (and
>gal) is in the current desktop package set...
>
Even if the default action is to launch a web browser for html pages,
there may be value in keeping the option of a gtkhtml2 view for
accessibility requirements. Is GtkHTML1 accessible ?
- John
>--
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
> alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
>He's an ungodly bohemian matador on the hunt for the last specimen of a great
>and near-mythical creature. She's a hard-bitten nymphomaniac vampire with the
>soul of a mighty warrior. They fight crime!
>
>_______________________________________________
>desktop-devel-list mailing list
>desktop-devel-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]