Re: Removing gtkhtml2 view



On 16 May 2002, Dave Bordoley wrote:

> oops trying again....
> 
> CCing desktop-devel. For those unfamiliar, we are discussing not
> shipping the nautilus gtkhtml view since it's pretty broken and buggy.
> Comments?
> 

The largest downside to not shipping it is that users will not be able to
view even very simple static html files residing on their local disk. Its
pretty unlikely that the 'view html source' is the behaviour they would be
expecting...

> dave
> 
> On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 11:35, Alex Larsson wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > 
> > > <quote who="Alex Larsson">
> > > 
> > > > a) We're not shipping the gtkhtml2 view
> > > 
> > > nautilus-gtkhtml has been in the desktop modules list for a long time now;
> > > as far as I know, no one has mentioned this to the release team, and we
> > > certainly haven't covered it.
> > 
> > Who put it there? It's quite broken and a huge source of bugs.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> 

	Sander

	you'll rescue me right?
	in the exact same way that they never did
	i'll be happy right?
	when your healing powers kick in





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]