Re: gnumeric and compiler attitude

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org> writes: 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68057

But that says it wasn't a gcc 2.96 bug, in the last comment.

> http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/devel/01c/0929.html

Same bug right?

http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_gcc.html

Every compiler expert at Red Hat says that 2.96 is far less buggy than
2.95.  So...  if you filter it, you probably want to filter gcc <=
2.96, not 2.96 specifically.

A better check might be to run a regression suite, though.

Havoc