Re: gnome-panel, gnome-deskop and gnome-session 2.0.0

[Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>]

On 11 Jun 2002, jacob berkman wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 23:27, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > On 10 Jun 2002, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> > 
> > > I think that we have a problem.
> > >
> > > gnome-session has 2.0.0 version but the splash image is the old one. I
> > > think that the meeting notes about the GNOME 2.0 release says that "we
> > > should remember to update the splash image"...
> > >
> > > What should we do now?
> > 
> > 	When a new splash screen is added I'll do a 2.0.1 release.
> > 2.0.0 is only a candidate for the GNOME 2.0.0 release.
> 
> isn't calling things 2.0.1 now bad mojo for gnome 2.0.1?
> 

IMHO viewing tarball names as indicator of gnome release names (and adding
just another level of dots to tarball names) is just a colossaly bad idea,
at least IMHO. there are much better ways to knowing what gnome version
(by whom, built on which date) you are using than loking at tarball dates
- say the xml file called gnome-version.xml in gnome-about.

>  - jacob
> 
> 

	Sander

	you'll rescue me right?
	in the exact same way that they never did
	i'll be happy right?
	when your healing powers kick in