Re: libgailutil and platform

["Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>]

Michael, Havoc,

I think I have got it now.

The fact that the number of the current interface of the library is 17 is an 
error on my part. I had hoped to correct this error but it is clear to me that I 
cannot and that I must move move forward with that number.

I will ensure that the number does not change with new releases of the library 
unless I break ABI which it is not my intention to do.

> Hi Padraig,
> 
> On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 09:29, Padraig O'Briain wrote:
> > I had intended to apply the patch in bug 89372 but do I understand correctly 
> > that you are requesting that this patch not be applied for 2.0.x branch.
> 
> 	The request is that you never change the .so number since it's the
> ultimate in breaking binary compatibility.
> 
> 	Assuming you're talking about bug #89327 - yes, it would be great to
> commit the patch - as long as it leaves the current .so number the same
> - as it is now.
> 
> 	Is that clearer ?
> 
> 		Michael.
> 
> -- 
>  mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list