Re: GNOME 2.0 Desktop 'Alpha' Release
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>
- Cc: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc linuxweasel com>, "Matthew J. Doller" <mdoller wpi edu>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Desktop 'Alpha' Release
- Date: 11 Jan 2002 13:26:21 -0500
On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 12:29, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc linuxweasel com> writes:
> > On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 09:02, Matthew J. Doller wrote:
> > > > And alpha isn't just for developers either. It is definately for everybody
> > > > to download (we are going to get binary packages as promised, right?) and
> > > > give it a test.
> > >
> > > if binary rpms are made available, would it be possible to have them be
> > > relocatable? if i'm going to install an alpha of gnome2, i'd like it to
> > > go into /opt, or /opt/gnome2
> > Well, theoretically, the RPMS are relocatable. However, since there are
> > current docs on relocating RPMs, these aren't tested. If you want to
> > test this feel free, and let me know where things break, and I'll see
> > what I can fix.
> > Greg
> Unfortunately, we compile the location a program is installed into in
> libgnome, meaning that RPM is unrelocatable, even if the files are.
i umm thought this was supposed to be fixed in gnome 2.
"In fact, can you imagine anything more terrifying than a zombie clown?"
] [Thread Prev