On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 17:01, Alex Graveley wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 19:47, Ian McKellar wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 18:08, Alex Graveley wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Everyone seems to be confused about gnome-vfs in relation to 2.2. So, > > > whats up? Are we going to use HEAD? The gnome-2-0 branch? > > > > My understanding is that we're going to use HEAD. This was the plan that > > I was aware of. When is 2.2 slated to freeze / come out anyway? > > Okay, then somebody needs to be keeping the HEAD branch in sync with the > changes to gnome-2-0. On trying to merge the vfolder stuff, I am > finding lots of missing module fixes, and a missing .po... and I'm not > even going to try to delve into what might be missing from libgnomevfs. crapola... I guess I'll have to devote some time to this at some point. I *hate* CVS branches. If this were perforce I would just p4 integrate it back... To all you hackers out there make sure you commit to head. And if you can't please file a bug in bugzilla with your branch patch attatched or we might lose it for 2.2. Ian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part