Re: two simple flex and bison patches

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 15:36, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > 	I believe that it's supposed to work if you don't have flex, Mark is
> > the one to get at though.
> 
> That's what I thought too, but countless of users in #garnome are a vocal 
> testament to the contrary.  So unless someone checks if this is actually 
> the case and libIDL can compile (and not end up with unresolved symbols 
> that in the case of having flex are provided by libfl, because this is the 
> main issue), I'd advise to just put the patch in for now.

	In addition to getting Mark to agree, you need to get the release team
to approve it for it to get into 2.0.2.

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot