Re: proposed 2.2 release schedule



Luis Villa <louie ximian com> writes:
> > There was a discussion at one of the recent release team meetings about
> > having a tiered freeze, starting at the lower level libraries and
> > gradually freezing them right the way up - this is probably a non-issue
> > for 2.2 since the API is well defined by now, but perhaps we could adopt
> > this process for future cycles?
> 
> Havoc? I know this has been something you've been concerned about in the
> past... thoughts? 

Doesn't seem to apply to 2.2, as far as I can tell. For future
releases, I guess I'd take a "cross bridge when we come to it"
approach.

Havoc



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]