Re: GSoC Weekly Report
- From: "Joe Shaw" <joe joeshaw org>
- To: "Debajyoti Bera" <dbera web gmail com>
- Cc: dashboard-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GSoC Weekly Report
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:18:01 -0400
Hi,
On 10/13/07, Debajyoti Bera <dbera web gmail com> wrote:
> What to do with our local changes to Mono.Data.SqliteClient ? I always get
> confused with them. Dont even know what are those changes and why are they
> there :-/ (it has something to with threading and locking) ?
The work done locally was mainly for memory usage reasons. IIRC, the
upstream bindings pull all of the results into memory at once, whereas
our locally modified ones do so only as needed. I don't think
threading/locking was ever an issue -- you might be confusing it with
the fact that we couldn't use early sqlite 3.x versions because of
broken policy in the library to that effect.
I'm not sure what the memory side effects of the newer upstream bindings are.
Joe
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]