Re: Epiphany Extention Conf [Patch]

The Galago checks do no harm since they are optional. We will actually
use them in the UI at a later stage (for the contact tile, etc.) so I
don't necessarily think they should be removed.


On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 12:17 -0500, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
> configure.ini does not allow the epiphany extension to be built
> against the current epiphany, as it wants epiphany 1.8 or 1.6, this
> adds support for 2.14, and removes the unused galago checks (as the
> current interface does not use them)

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]