On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 11:01 +0200, John Stowers wrote: > > > 2008/9/27 Matt Colyer <matt colyer name> > So currently if a data source doesn't have mtimes, the > synchronization > pretty much just gives up. > > I have attached a patch to compute whether both sides of the > synchronization have been modified. If they haven't been both > modified > we can safely assume that the modified one is the one that we > want. If > they have been both modified we retain the original behavior. > > Hi Matt, > > This sounds good. I will have a play with this today. Any chance you > could also add a test for this, perhaps to TestCoreSyncLogic.py? > > Otherwise i will work on adding a test later today Forgive me for being a bit dense but I couldn't figure out how to run the tests. Is there a command that I need to install (like nosetests)? I tried looking on the website and the README and couldn't find anything. -Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part