Re: Patch for syncing using hashes

On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 11:01 +0200, John Stowers wrote:
> 2008/9/27 Matt Colyer <matt colyer name>
>         So currently if a data source doesn't have mtimes, the
>         synchronization
>         pretty much just gives up.
>         I have attached a patch to compute whether both sides of the
>         synchronization have been modified. If they haven't been both
>         modified
>         we can safely assume that the modified one is the one that we
>         want. If
>         they have been both modified we retain the original behavior.
> Hi Matt,
> This sounds good. I will have a play with this today. Any chance you
> could also add a test for this, perhaps to
> Otherwise i will work on adding a test later today

Forgive me for being a bit dense but I couldn't figure out how to run
the tests. Is there a command that I need to install (like nosetests)?

I tried looking on the website and the README and couldn't find


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]