Re: Remember the Milk
- From: "John Stowers" <john stowers gmail com>
- To: "Kevin Kubasik" <kevin kubasik net>
- Cc: Conduit <conduit-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Remember the Milk
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 23:35:03 +1200
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:54 PM, John Stowers <john stowers gmail com> wrote:
> 2008/4/11 Kevin Kubasik <kevin kubasik net>:
>> Initial work is up here
>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510108 almost at the point
>> of being a workable source, but I chose to start by gunning for 2way
>> with this one. (bad call)
>>
>> Anyways, this was an experiment-oriented project, and served me well
>> as far as learning more of the guts of Conduit and how it functionally
>> does things (or doesn't in this case). Lemme know what your workign on
>> specifically so if I get some free time we done duplicate ;)
>
> I committed the above patch to make it easier for you guys to work
> together on this.
> * If you end up improving pyrtm so much to make it useful we can
> release it as an external library, or keep it in tree.
> * Also, remember to add a test for any work you do.
> * put() is the hardest function for two way. See
> http://www.conduit-project.org/wiki/WritingADataProvider/GeneralPutInstructions
> for the recommended implementation
>
> Some quick comments (from the bug)
>
>> problems understanding the differences between UIDs, URI's, and LUID's wrt
>> conduit,
>
> data UID (sometimes called LUID) = the unique representation RTM uses
> to store the data. The point is that is need only be locally unique,
> that is unique within RTM for some set of criteria. It need not be
> globally unique because it is in effect 'namespaced' within the UID of
> the dataprovider
> dataprovider UID = This forms the namespace part of the data storage.
> A dataproviders UID should encompass that information which describes
> its unique configuration such that if two dataprovider are congigured
> identically, they should have the same UID.
>
> Therefor:
> data LUID + dataprovider UID = Globally unique identifier for a bit of data.
>
> Having a UID for the dataprovider and the data is necessary because
> not all dataproviders allow us to attach arbitary generated GUIDs to
> data we touch. It is also necessary to have two identically configured
> dataproviders have the same UID so that we can detect when something
> is deleted.
>
> The URI is just a conveniece, and is used in comparison. ITs just a
> URI that can be opened to allow the user to compare the data they are
> talking about. Not all data has a URI, and often the datas URI is
> different to its UID. For example the UID for a flickr data is some
> random string, while its URI is (should be?) that photos page on
> flickr.
Hi Guys,
Has there been any progress on remember the milk?
John
>
> HTH
>
> John
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]