Re: Conduit arch dependence, redux
- From: Adam Williamson <awilliamson mandriva com>
- To: Ken VanDine <ken vandine org>
- Cc: conduit-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Conduit arch dependence, redux
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:47:17 -0700
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 13:31 -0400, Ken VanDine wrote:
> Ah, I read that the opposite. I don't have strong beliefs one way or
> the other then, our build system automatically produces all the arches
> so it is no more work either way.
>
> I know if we went to python-setuptools it has some notion of pure
> python, perhaps that is the right answer.
setuptools has its own problems (actually apps often migrate *from*
setuptools *to* autotools as they get more mature).
Our bs produces all arches automatically too (let's not make this a bs
willy-waving contest), of course: the point is not that archified
packages are more work but that noarch packages are more correct. If
there's no reason for a package to be archified, it really shouldn't be.
--
adamw
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]