[glib: 1/2] doc: Clarify that _locker_new() does not actually allocate memory
- From: Philip Withnall <pwithnall src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [glib: 1/2] doc: Clarify that _locker_new() does not actually allocate memory
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
commit 8c61dce5453825ce4ce616aa8f7b69980fcfc139
Author: Xavier Claessens <xavier claessens collabora com>
Date: Fri Jan 31 16:00:28 2020 +0100
doc: Clarify that _locker_new() does not actually allocate memory
It is important to document the performance (non-)impact of such
critical functions.
glib/gthread.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
---
diff --git a/glib/gthread.h b/glib/gthread.h
index 366b0ad67..a8c7ac777 100644
--- a/glib/gthread.h
+++ b/glib/gthread.h
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ typedef void GMutexLocker;
* g_mutex_locker_free(). Using g_mutex_unlock() on @mutex
* while a #GMutexLocker exists can lead to undefined behaviour.
*
+ * No allocation is performed, it is equivalent to a g_mutex_lock() call.
+ *
* This is intended to be used with g_autoptr(). Note that g_autoptr()
* is only available when using GCC or clang, so the following example
* will only work with those compilers:
@@ -328,6 +330,8 @@ g_mutex_locker_new (GMutex *mutex)
*
* Unlock @locker's mutex. See g_mutex_locker_new() for details.
*
+ * No memory is freed, it is equivalent to a g_mutex_unlock() call.
+ *
* Since: 2.44
*/
static inline void
@@ -352,6 +356,8 @@ typedef void GRecMutexLocker;
* g_rec_mutex_locker_free(). Using g_rec_mutex_unlock() on @rec_mutex
* while a #GRecMutexLocker exists can lead to undefined behaviour.
*
+ * No allocation is performed, it is equivalent to a g_rec_mutex_lock() call.
+ *
* This is intended to be used with g_autoptr(). Note that g_autoptr()
* is only available when using GCC or clang, so the following example
* will only work with those compilers:
@@ -397,6 +403,8 @@ g_rec_mutex_locker_new (GRecMutex *rec_mutex)
*
* Unlock @locker's recursive mutex. See g_rec_mutex_locker_new() for details.
*
+ * No memory is freed, it is equivalent to a g_rec_mutex_unlock() call.
+ *
* Since: 2.60
*/
static inline void
@@ -422,6 +430,8 @@ typedef void GRWLockWriterLocker;
* on @rw_lock while a #GRWLockWriterLocker exists can lead to undefined
* behaviour.
*
+ * No allocation is performed, it is equivalent to a g_rw_lock_writer_lock() call.
+ *
* This is intended to be used with g_autoptr(). Note that g_autoptr()
* is only available when using GCC or clang, so the following example
* will only work with those compilers:
@@ -498,6 +508,8 @@ g_rw_lock_writer_locker_new (GRWLock *rw_lock)
* Release a write lock on @locker's read-write lock. See
* g_rw_lock_writer_locker_new() for details.
*
+ * No memory is freed, it is equivalent to a g_rw_lock_writer_unlock() call.
+ *
* Since: 2.62
*/
static inline void
@@ -523,6 +535,8 @@ typedef void GRWLockReaderLocker;
* on @rw_lock while a #GRWLockReaderLocker exists can lead to undefined
* behaviour.
*
+ * No allocation is performed, it is equivalent to a g_rw_lock_reader_lock() call.
+ *
* This is intended to be used with g_autoptr(). For a code sample, see
* g_rw_lock_writer_locker_new().
*
@@ -543,6 +557,8 @@ g_rw_lock_reader_locker_new (GRWLock *rw_lock)
* Release a read lock on @locker's read-write lock. See
* g_rw_lock_reader_locker_new() for details.
*
+ * No memory is freed, it is equivalent to a g_rw_lock_reader_unlock() call.
+ *
* Since: 2.62
*/
static inline void
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]