[glib-networking: 112/129] Set a negative priority so glib-networking is loaded instead of glib-openssl
- From: Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [glib-networking: 112/129] Set a negative priority so glib-networking is loaded instead of glib-openssl
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
commit c675daa4dd68bcfe0c0e660c0de7326ff92f1ae3
Author: Ignacio Casal Quinteiro <qignacio amazon com>
Date: Mon Mar 19 08:49:49 2018 +0100
Set a negative priority so glib-networking is loaded instead of glib-openssl
With this I am not saying that glib-openssl is less maintained
but that we want to use glib-networking instead of glib-openssl
for applications like Epiphany, since it is more tested for
those use cases. Instead I still encourage the usage of glib-openssl
since it is what we currently have available for windows and old
distributions.
tls/openssl/gtlsbackend-openssl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff --git a/tls/openssl/gtlsbackend-openssl.c b/tls/openssl/gtlsbackend-openssl.c
index f118c53..10c8ed2 100644
--- a/tls/openssl/gtlsbackend-openssl.c
+++ b/tls/openssl/gtlsbackend-openssl.c
@@ -280,5 +280,5 @@ g_tls_backend_openssl_register (GIOModule *module)
g_io_extension_point_implement (G_TLS_BACKEND_EXTENSION_POINT_NAME,
g_tls_backend_openssl_get_type(),
"openssl",
- 100);
+ -1);
}
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]