[gimp-book-painting] Adding Mary Cassat interpretation...

[Americo Gobbo <amerigo src gnome org>]

commit d036b14d5cb47d0ca23ce7dddd2e57040acb2f58
Author: Americo Gobbo <jag rabisco gmail com>
Date:   Sun Jun 17 17:55:12 2018 -0300

    Adding Mary Cassat interpretation...

 ...etric-brushes-deveze-parametric-brushset-sample.png | Bin 447330 -> 0 bytes
 .../parametric-brushes-mary-cassat-part-jag.webp       | Bin 0 -> 350278 bytes
 parametric-brushes.md                                  |   6 +++---
 style-and-gimp.md                                      |   8 +++-----
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-mary-cassat-part-jag.webp 
b/parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-mary-cassat-part-jag.webp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b16fe0
Binary files /dev/null and b/parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-mary-cassat-part-jag.webp differ
diff --git a/parametric-brushes.md b/parametric-brushes.md
index e18ad24..2324c76 100644
--- a/parametric-brushes.md
+++ b/parametric-brushes.md
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 Author: Americo Gobbo<br>
 Date: 2018 June
 
-<figure><img src="parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-personaggio-bizarro.jpg">
-<figcaption><br>A fast sample made in 2013 by Americo Gobbo with Dry Media paint and parametric 
brushes.</figcaption>
+<figure><img src="parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-personaggio-bizarro.jpg" width="640">
+<figcaption><br>*A fast sample made in 2013 by Americo Gobbo with Dry Media paint dynamics and parametric 
brushes.*</figcaption>
 </figure>
 
 ## Which is better as classical brush, the parametric or a raster brush?
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ The stroke of parametric brush is more sharpest and hard when we use hardness eq
 ## How to combine parametric brushes and paint dynamics
 I think is not possible have an unequivocal rule to combine brushes with paint dynamics, instead is possible 
to say that, in general: each paint dynamics represents an effect or a different technique.
 
-![](parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-deveze-parametric-brushset-sample.png)<br>*A Gustavo Deveze 
using the Dry Media paint dynamics with the brushset of parametric brushes.*
+![](parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-mary-cassat-part-jag.webp)<br>*Interpretation of Mary 
Cassat painting with pastel.  Dry Media paint dynamics with the brush set of parametric brushes.*
 
 ### Dry Media Experiments
 I thought to begin with classic main dry media as pencil, crayon, charcoal and pastel.
diff --git a/style-and-gimp.md b/style-and-gimp.md
index 3eefdc7..6f3c8c6 100644
--- a/style-and-gimp.md
+++ b/style-and-gimp.md
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 # Style & GIMP
 
-GIMP has the capability to adapt very well with many styles and ways to painting from the well-formed to 
personal and/or customized styles.
-Is evident that each artist do paintings with our own styles (or unawares are considered as theirs) or using 
some traditional manner of the painting. So, any kind of software to digital painting has a UI and that 
creates certain conditions, many times not specifically and/or purposely, to superposes the 'inner' style 
painting in our's style. This is more common when the apps are deeply based upon tool presets… and where the 
application is viewed more as presets ready for the painting.
+GIMP has the capability to adapt very well with many styles and ways to painting from the well-formed to 
personal and/or customized styles. Is evident that each artist do paintings with our own styles (or 
'unawarely' considered as theirs) or using some traditional manner of the painting. So, any kind of software 
to digital painting has a UI and that creates certain conditions, many times not specifically and/or 
purposely, and superposes the 'inner' style painting on our's style. This is more common when the apps are 
deeply based upon tool presets… and where the application is viewed or is interpreted more as preset 
collections ready for the painting.
 
 To explain it better I think usable this metaphor:
 
@@ -10,15 +9,14 @@ To explain it better I think usable this metaphor:
  * The 'style' or 'our own way' to expressing sensations, ideas in the art form is molded by the UI;
  * The language is molded by the influences and relations with UI;
  * So, different software's UI promote naturally an imprinting on the our own styles in an unaware way;
- * If we have languages, UI, where the capabilities are in some way expressing with a 'style', that is not 
our own…
-* all things, that we do with this software also will be influenced by it.
+ * If we have languages, UI, where the capabilities are in some way expressing with a inherent 'style', the 
resulting style is in part also an heritage of that ...
+* all things, that we do with a software also will be influenced (more or less) by it.
 
 When we are using a tool preset to painting anything, is important know the designer of the preset and his 
style… so, is probable that the way and how the preset is working/showing the results are more aligned with 
designer's style than that of the user that using it.
 
 So, is possible that using different applications our 'style' could be influenced by them, read the 
interesting chat discussion that I did with Elias Silveira, questions 3 and 4). I intend discuss this better 
on the next point on Prêt-à-porter.
 
 ## Tool Preset as Prêt-à-porter
-
 Since is introduced the Tool Presets on GIMP (when I began utilize, on 2.6+ release, them were already 
present), it becomes an application capable to record the our way painting's style… and is possible also to 
share them with other painters and common users.
 
 In this sense the French term "Prêt-à-porter" (Ready-to-use) from the fashion is important to understand why 
reason the presets have inner an way to understand the painting and therefore have an own style.