[gimp-book-painting] Captions gitlab issue...

[Americo Gobbo <amerigo src gnome org>]

commit 73ba0435d31715bd66909483ff05110d18e4c552
Author: Americo Gobbo <jag rabisco gmail com>
Date:   Sat Jun 16 18:18:59 2018 -0300

    Captions gitlab issue...

 parametric-brushes.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/parametric-brushes.md b/parametric-brushes.md
index 4d9c020..f58921f 100644
--- a/parametric-brushes.md
+++ b/parametric-brushes.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Author: Americo Americo <br>
 Date: 2018 June
 
 <figure><img src="parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-personaggio-bizarro.jpg">
-<figcaption>_A fast sample made in 2013 by Americo Gobbo with Dry Media paint and parametric 
brushes._</figcaption>
+<figcaption>A fast sample made in 2013 by Americo Gobbo with Dry Media paint and parametric 
brushes.</figcaption>
 </figure>
 
 ## Which is better as classical brush, the parametric or a raster brush?
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ I thought a simple test … I did a parametric calligraphic brush, very small wi
 
 From my tests among both brushes, it results that the parametric is better than its equivalent .gbr, if are 
thinking in classic dabs, round, square, diamond and variations of shape forms based in spikes.
 
-![](parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-dialog-editor.png)_Brushset and Parametric Editor_
+![](parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-dialog-editor.png "Image Title")*Brush set and Parametric 
Editor*
 
 The default shapes are round, square and diamond. Is also possible create a great variation of the shapes, 
using the different parameters to control the shape and its aspect (radius, spikes, hardness, aspect ratio, 
angle and spacing).