[gimp-book-painting] Revision links images...

[Americo Gobbo <amerigo src gnome org>]

commit 3a809bab7134c8f4ed1a2e105ce3fbb6b781dae1
Author: Americo Gobbo <jag rabisco gmail com>
Date:   Sat Jun 16 15:59:22 2018 -0300

    Revision links images...

 parametric-brushes.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
---
diff --git a/parametric-brushes.md b/parametric-brushes.md
index 1eeee14..f2f6044 100644
--- a/parametric-brushes.md
+++ b/parametric-brushes.md
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ My idea is very simple, up to what point the parametric brush, as a classical br
 I thought a simple test … I did a parametric calligraphic brush, very small with a radius equal to 12 px. 
After I have made a stamp of my parametric brush and build a static raster brush (.gbr).
 
 From my tests among both brushes, it results that the parametric is better than its equivalent .gbr, if are 
thinking in classic dabs, round, square, diamond and variations of shape forms based in spikes.
+
 <div style="margin:20px;">
 ![](parametric-brushes.assets/parametric-brushes-basic-parametric-brushes-editor-brs.png)
 <div style="font-size:small;">_Brushset and Parametric Editor_</div></div>