[gimp-book-painting] Figure descriptions with custom CSS

[Americo Gobbo <amerigo src gnome org>]

commit 4e587907b11afcfe7e8495e500c4b78da4313a07
Author: Americo Gobbo <jag rabisco gmail com>
Date:   Fri Jun 15 17:20:03 2018 -0300

    Figure descriptions with custom CSS

 parametric-brushes.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff --git a/parametric-brushes.md b/parametric-brushes.md
index ce38cae..044673a 100644
--- a/parametric-brushes.md
+++ b/parametric-brushes.md
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ _Noise in my head, by Jag, 2013._
 
 ## Which is better as classical brush, the parametric or a raster brush?
 
-On GIMP the brush set have an small quantity of parametric brushes… why reason? Sincerely I do not know, 
perhaps, many illustrators, concept artists, photographers have been accustomed to see/utilize only raster 
brushes.
+On GIMP the brush set have a small amount of parametric brushes… why reason? Sincerely I do not know, 
perhaps, many illustrators, concept artists, photographers have been accustomed to see/utilize only raster 
brushes.
 
 My idea is very simple, up to what point the parametric brush, as a classical brush, could be used on 
digital painting?