[gtk+/wip/baedert/gtkimageview: 65/135] GtkImageView: Don't call fix_anchor if fit-allocation is set
- From: Timm Bäder <baedert src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gtk+/wip/baedert/gtkimageview: 65/135] GtkImageView: Don't call fix_anchor if fit-allocation is set
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:46:20 +0000 (UTC)
commit 89bbb9d18c4e38857793ebf879ca80529fc613c0
Author: Timm Bäder <mail baedert org>
Date: Mon Jan 25 16:51:02 2016 +0100
GtkImageView: Don't call fix_anchor if fit-allocation is set
Doesn't make much sense in that case.
gtk/gtkimageview.c | 7 ++-----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/gtk/gtkimageview.c b/gtk/gtkimageview.c
index af3a246..aad31dc 100644
--- a/gtk/gtkimageview.c
+++ b/gtk/gtkimageview.c
@@ -714,8 +714,7 @@ gesture_rotate_changed_cb (GtkGestureRotate *gesture,
priv->size_valid = FALSE;
gtk_image_view_update_adjustments (image_view);
- if (priv->hadjustment && priv->vadjustment &&
- !priv->fit_allocation)
+ if (priv->hadjustment && priv->vadjustment && !priv->fit_allocation)
gtk_image_view_fix_anchor (image_view,
priv->anchor_x,
priv->anchor_y,
@@ -1221,8 +1220,7 @@ gtk_image_view_set_angle (GtkImageView *image_view,
// TODO: Would we have to document this behavior? Or make it configurable?
- if (priv->hadjustment != NULL && priv->vadjustment != NULL &&
- !priv->fit_allocation)
+ if (priv->hadjustment && priv->vadjustment && !priv->fit_allocation)
gtk_image_view_fix_anchor (image_view,
priv->anchor_x,
priv->anchor_y,
@@ -1332,7 +1330,6 @@ gtk_image_view_set_fit_allocation (GtkImageView *image_view,
gtk_image_view_update_adjustments (image_view);
gtk_widget_queue_resize (GTK_WIDGET (image_view));
- gtk_image_view_update_adjustments (image_view);
}
gboolean
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]