[gucharmap] chartable: Show glyphs for some format characters
- From: Christian Persch <chpe src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gucharmap] chartable: Show glyphs for some format characters
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:42:18 +0000 (UTC)
commit 44ab0c02a2700e1e0839b1689c009b29a84cb752
Author: Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny eglug org>
Date: Mon Aug 1 20:42:04 2016 +0200
chartable: Show glyphs for some format characters
Even though they're format characters, those that are
Prepended_Concatenation_Mark should be rendered with a
visible glyph, per Unicode book.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658853
gucharmap/gucharmap-unicode-info.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/gucharmap/gucharmap-unicode-info.c b/gucharmap/gucharmap-unicode-info.c
index e773389..fae179f 100644
--- a/gucharmap/gucharmap-unicode-info.c
+++ b/gucharmap/gucharmap-unicode-info.c
@@ -598,8 +598,24 @@ gucharmap_unichar_isgraph (gunichar uc)
{
GUnicodeType t = gucharmap_unichar_type (uc);
+ /* From http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode9.0.0/ch09.pdf, p16
+ * "Unlike most other format control characters, however, they should be
+ * rendered with a visible glyph, even in circumstances where no suitable
+ * digit or sequence of digits follows them in logical order."
+ * There the standard talks about the ar signs spanning numbers, but
+ * I think this should apply to all Prepended_Concatenation_Mark format
+ * characters.
+ * Instead of parsing the corresponding data file, just hardcode the
+ * (few!) existing characters here.
+ */
+ if (t == G_UNICODE_FORMAT)
+ return (uc >= 0x0600 && uc <= 0x0605) ||
+ uc == 0x06DD ||
+ uc == 0x070F ||
+ uc == 0x08E2 ||
+ uc == 0x110BD;
+
return (t != G_UNICODE_CONTROL
- && t != G_UNICODE_FORMAT
&& t != G_UNICODE_UNASSIGNED
&& t != G_UNICODE_PRIVATE_USE
&& t != G_UNICODE_SURROGATE
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]