[gtk+/wip/cssnode3: 78/91] cssnode: Change the way we invalidate timestamps
- From: Benjamin Otte <otte src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gtk+/wip/cssnode3: 78/91] cssnode: Change the way we invalidate timestamps
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:12:04 +0000 (UTC)
commit 6365dca7c27f8ea2f46f94d239eb1f8256eb62ab
Author: Benjamin Otte <otte redhat com>
Date: Sat Feb 28 02:22:38 2015 +0100
cssnode: Change the way we invalidate timestamps
Do not propagate the TIMESTAMP change through the node tree, as that
causes lots of uneeded markings of nodes as invalid.
Instead, walk the node tree and find the nodes that have a non-static
style and only invalidate timestamps on those.
gtk/gtkcssnode.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/gtk/gtkcssnode.c b/gtk/gtkcssnode.c
index 297068b..547cfb9 100644
--- a/gtk/gtkcssnode.c
+++ b/gtk/gtkcssnode.c
@@ -841,6 +841,23 @@ gtk_css_node_invalidate_style_provider (GtkCssNode *cssnode)
}
}
+static void
+gtk_css_node_invalidate_timestamp (GtkCssNode *cssnode)
+{
+ GtkCssNode *child;
+
+ if (!cssnode->invalid)
+ return;
+
+ if (!gtk_css_style_is_static (cssnode->style))
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_TIMESTAMP);
+
+ for (child = cssnode->first_child; child; child = child->next_sibling)
+ {
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate_timestamp (child);
+ }
+}
+
void
gtk_css_node_invalidate_frame_clock (GtkCssNode *cssnode,
gboolean just_timestamp)
@@ -849,10 +866,10 @@ gtk_css_node_invalidate_frame_clock (GtkCssNode *cssnode,
if (cssnode->parent)
return;
- if (just_timestamp)
- gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_TIMESTAMP);
- else
- gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_TIMESTAMP | GTK_CSS_CHANGE_ANIMATIONS);
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate_timestamp (cssnode);
+
+ if (!just_timestamp)
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_ANIMATIONS);
}
void
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]