[gtk+/wip/cssnode3: 78/88] cssnode: Change the way we invalidate timestamps
- From: Benjamin Otte <otte src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gtk+/wip/cssnode3: 78/88] cssnode: Change the way we invalidate timestamps
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 19:57:24 +0000 (UTC)
commit 1ce2cf08fd3d5da6a4a35a9864ded3962a1dffb3
Author: Benjamin Otte <otte redhat com>
Date: Sat Feb 28 02:22:38 2015 +0100
cssnode: Change the way we invalidate timestamps
Do not propagate the TIMESTAMP change through the node tree, as that
causes lots of uneeded markings of nodes as invalid.
Instead, walk the node tree and find the nodes that have a non-static
style and only invalidate timestamps on those.
gtk/gtkcssnode.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/gtk/gtkcssnode.c b/gtk/gtkcssnode.c
index 297068b..547cfb9 100644
--- a/gtk/gtkcssnode.c
+++ b/gtk/gtkcssnode.c
@@ -841,6 +841,23 @@ gtk_css_node_invalidate_style_provider (GtkCssNode *cssnode)
}
}
+static void
+gtk_css_node_invalidate_timestamp (GtkCssNode *cssnode)
+{
+ GtkCssNode *child;
+
+ if (!cssnode->invalid)
+ return;
+
+ if (!gtk_css_style_is_static (cssnode->style))
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_TIMESTAMP);
+
+ for (child = cssnode->first_child; child; child = child->next_sibling)
+ {
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate_timestamp (child);
+ }
+}
+
void
gtk_css_node_invalidate_frame_clock (GtkCssNode *cssnode,
gboolean just_timestamp)
@@ -849,10 +866,10 @@ gtk_css_node_invalidate_frame_clock (GtkCssNode *cssnode,
if (cssnode->parent)
return;
- if (just_timestamp)
- gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_TIMESTAMP);
- else
- gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_TIMESTAMP | GTK_CSS_CHANGE_ANIMATIONS);
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate_timestamp (cssnode);
+
+ if (!just_timestamp)
+ gtk_css_node_invalidate (cssnode, GTK_CSS_CHANGE_ANIMATIONS);
}
void
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]