[gnome-devel-docs] platform-overview: Tweak licence page to mention LGPLv2.1+ over LGPLv2.1
- From: Philip Withnall <pwithnall src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gnome-devel-docs] platform-overview: Tweak licence page to mention LGPLv2.1+ over LGPLv2.1
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:05:50 +0000 (UTC)
commit 226af90803b8a186155a0b057b9b4d07165ff3bb
Author: Philip Withnall <philip withnall collabora co uk>
Date: Wed Feb 4 11:39:11 2015 +0000
platform-overview: Tweak licence page to mention LGPLv2.1+ over LGPLv2.1
LGPLv2.1= is a very odd licence to choose, and almost all projects go
with LGPLv2.1+ instead. For consistency with the text below which
mentions GPLv2+, add a ‘+’ to the LGPL sentence.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376123
platform-overview/C/license.page | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/platform-overview/C/license.page b/platform-overview/C/license.page
index 1272f7e..097b4c7 100644
--- a/platform-overview/C/license.page
+++ b/platform-overview/C/license.page
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
<p>Libraries which are used in GNOME are usually licensed under the
<link href="http://www.gnu.org/">GNU</link>
- <link href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html">LGPL 2.1</link>.</p>
+ <link href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html">LGPL 2.1+</link>.</p>
<p>Most newer GNOME applications are licensed under
<link href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html">GPL3+</link>, while
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]