[gnumeric-web] Style.
- From: Morten Welinder <mortenw src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [gnumeric-web] Style.
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:23:41 +0000 (UTC)
commit d136a2e5d38710b358eda4cef97903fa8a7d749e
Author: Morten Welinder <terra gnome org>
Date: Thu Apr 16 20:23:34 2015 -0400
Style.
announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html b/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html
index 8027695..554cb6d 100644
--- a/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html
+++ b/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html
@@ -42,17 +42,17 @@
Gnumeric files we produce are valid according to the relevant
xml schema.</p>
<ul>
- <li>For Gnumeric files we produce the schema.</li>
+ <li>For Gnumeric files we provide the schema.</li>
<li>For XLSX there is an official schema which we use with a
few fixes so Excel can read our files. (We consider the
format to be defined by what XLSX writes.)</li>
<li>For ODS the situation is more problematic. We appear to be
the first to release a schema for the ODS files we produce.
That is mildly shocking -- several spreadsheets have ODS as
- their primary format, yet no-one seem to be validating the
- files they produce!
+ their primary format, yet <em>no-one seem to be validating the
+ files they produce!</em>
There is an official schema for the
- format without extensions. That is fine, except that no-one
+ format without extensions which is fine, except that no-one
uses that format because there are lots of fairly basic
things that cannot be expressed in the format without
extensions.</li>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]