[gnumeric-web] Typos and layout.

[Morten Welinder <mortenw src gnome org>]

commit 0c329737e84d7f2b586630f656f02f9e898bb0e6
Author: Morten Welinder <terra gnome org>
Date:   Thu Apr 16 20:19:04 2015 -0400

    Typos and layout.

 announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html |   32 +++++++++++++++--------------
 index.html                               |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html b/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html
index e318558..8027695 100644
--- a/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html
+++ b/announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html
@@ -40,21 +40,23 @@
         </ul>
        <p>As part of our testing we check that the ODF, XLSX, and
        Gnumeric files we produce are valid according to the relevant
-       xml schema.</p>
-       <p>For Gnumeric files we produce the schema.</p>
-       <p>For XLSX there is an official schema which we use with a
-       few fixes so Excel can read our files.  (We consider the
-       format to be defined by what XLSX writes.)</p>
-       <p>For ODS the situation is more problematic.  We appear to be
-         the first to release a schema for the ODS files we produce.
-         That is mildly shocking -- several spreadsheets have ODS as
-         their primary format, yet no-one seem to be validating the
-         files they produce!  There is an official schema for the
-         format without extensions.  That is fine, except that no-one
-         uses that format because there are lots of fairly basic
-         things that cannot be expressed in the format without
-         extensions.</p>
-
+         xml schema.</p>
+       <ul>
+         <li>For Gnumeric files we produce the schema.</li>
+         <li>For XLSX there is an official schema which we use with a
+           few fixes so Excel can read our files.  (We consider the
+           format to be defined by what XLSX writes.)</li>
+         <li>For ODS the situation is more problematic.  We appear to be
+           the first to release a schema for the ODS files we produce.
+           That is mildly shocking -- several spreadsheets have ODS as
+           their primary format, yet no-one seem to be validating the
+           files they produce!
+           There is an official schema for the
+           format without extensions.  That is fine, except that no-one
+           uses that format because there are lots of fairly basic
+           things that cannot be expressed in the format without
+           extensions.</li>
+       </ul>
         <p>Details of changes by contributor:</p>
         <ul>
         <li>Andreas
diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index e1e5586..054f927 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
            <span class="month">Apr</span>
            <span class="year">2015</span>
          </span>
-         Gnumeric 1.12.21
+         Gnumeric 1.12.22
        </h2>
        <p><a href="announcements/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.22.html">Gnumeric
            1.12.22 is out</a>.  Get it