[evolution] Bug #711443 - IMAPX account unread count goes only up, not down
- From: Milan Crha <mcrha src gnome org>
- To: commits-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [evolution] Bug #711443 - IMAPX account unread count goes only up, not down
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:42:00 +0000 (UTC)
commit d80607dbcbaf4f245a270698dbcae71869b8450b
Author: Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>
Date: Thu Feb 20 13:39:03 2014 +0100
Bug #711443 - IMAPX account unread count goes only up, not down
libemail-engine/mail-folder-cache.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/libemail-engine/mail-folder-cache.c b/libemail-engine/mail-folder-cache.c
index c6bcb14..d6bb1e5 100644
--- a/libemail-engine/mail-folder-cache.c
+++ b/libemail-engine/mail-folder-cache.c
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct _StoreInfo {
GHashTable *folder_info_ht; /* by full_name */
gboolean first_update; /* TRUE, then FALSE forever */
+ GSList *pending_folder_notes; /* Gather note_folder calls during first_update period */
/* Hold a reference to keep them alive. */
CamelFolder *vjunk;
@@ -340,6 +341,8 @@ store_info_unref (StoreInfo *store_info)
g_clear_object (&store_info->vjunk);
g_clear_object (&store_info->vtrash);
+ g_slist_free_full (store_info->pending_folder_notes, g_object_unref);
+
g_mutex_clear (&store_info->lock);
g_slice_free (StoreInfo, store_info);
@@ -1662,6 +1665,7 @@ mail_folder_cache_first_update (MailFolderCache *cache,
CamelService *service;
CamelSession *session;
const gchar *uid;
+ GSList *folders, *iter;
service = CAMEL_SERVICE (store_info->store);
session = camel_service_ref_session (service);
@@ -1686,6 +1690,18 @@ mail_folder_cache_first_update (MailFolderCache *cache,
}
g_object_unref (session);
+
+ g_mutex_lock (&store_info->lock);
+ store_info->first_update = FALSE;
+ folders = store_info->pending_folder_notes;
+ store_info->pending_folder_notes = NULL;
+ g_mutex_unlock (&store_info->lock);
+
+ for (iter = folders; iter; iter = g_slist_next (iter)) {
+ mail_folder_cache_note_folder (cache, iter->data);
+ }
+
+ g_slist_free_full (folders, g_object_unref);
}
/* Helper for mail_folder_cache_note_store() */
@@ -1766,9 +1782,12 @@ mail_folder_cache_note_store_thread (GSimpleAsyncResult *simple,
create_folders (cache, async_context->info, store_info);
/* Do some extra work for the first update. */
+ g_mutex_lock (&store_info->lock);
if (store_info->first_update) {
+ g_mutex_unlock (&store_info->lock);
mail_folder_cache_first_update (cache, store_info);
- store_info->first_update = FALSE;
+ } else {
+ g_mutex_unlock (&store_info->lock);
}
exit:
@@ -1913,8 +1932,37 @@ mail_folder_cache_note_folder (MailFolderCache *cache,
/* XXX Not sure we should just be returning quietly here, but
* the old code did. Using g_return_if_fail() causes a few
* warnings on startup which might be worth tracking down. */
- if (folder_info == NULL)
- return;
+ if (folder_info == NULL) {
+ StoreInfo *store_info;
+ gboolean retry = FALSE;
+
+ store_info = mail_folder_cache_ref_store_info (cache, parent_store);
+ if (!store_info)
+ return;
+
+ g_mutex_lock (&store_info->lock);
+ if (store_info->first_update) {
+ /* The first update did not finish yet, thus add this as a pending
+ folder to be noted once the first update finishes */
+ store_info->pending_folder_notes = g_slist_prepend (
+ store_info->pending_folder_notes, g_object_ref (folder));
+ } else {
+ /* It can be that certain threading interleaving made
+ the first store update finished before we reached
+ this place, thus retry to get the folder info */
+ retry = TRUE;
+ }
+ g_mutex_unlock (&store_info->lock);
+
+ store_info_unref (store_info);
+
+ if (retry)
+ folder_info = mail_folder_cache_ref_folder_info (
+ cache, parent_store, full_name);
+
+ if (!folder_info)
+ return;
+ }
g_mutex_lock (&folder_info->lock);
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]