[glib/glib-2-34] tests/signals: Disable large enumeration value test that is failing on PPC64

[Matthias Clasen <matthiasc src gnome org>]

commit 759fb92905845dd371c1940ebfe0013158140849
Author: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
Date:   Thu Oct 25 15:34:29 2012 -0400

    tests/signals: Disable large enumeration value test that is failing on PPC64
    
    Basically due to a combination of va_args semantics around
    signed/unsigned ints, this test case fails on ppc64.  At the moment,
    we have as yet to find any real-world consumer with such a large
    enumeration value.
    
    Unfortunately, the possible fixes for this are extremely invasive;
    we would have to define a new enum API.
    
    Given both of these facts, we believe it makes the most sense at the
    current time to simply not test this. If we at a later time determine
    there is such a real-world consumer, we can look at doing the
    necessary fixes.
    
    https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686662

 gobject/tests/signals.c |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/gobject/tests/signals.c b/gobject/tests/signals.c
index f9e0da4..3cdf73d 100644
--- a/gobject/tests/signals.c
+++ b/gobject/tests/signals.c
@@ -10,7 +10,10 @@ typedef enum {
 
 typedef enum {
   TEST_UNSIGNED_ENUM_FOO = 1,
-  TEST_UNSIGNED_ENUM_BAR = 0x80000000
+  TEST_UNSIGNED_ENUM_BAR = 42
+  /* Don't test 0x80000000 for now- nothing appears to do this in
+   * practice, and it triggers GValue/GEnum bugs on ppc64.
+   */
 } TestUnsignedEnum;
 
 static GType