[latexila] TODO updated

[SÃbastien Wilmet <swilmet src gnome org>]

commit 9758c5ecbb5962029b16dea33b04bcdedb861d28
Author: SÃbastien Wilmet <swilmet src gnome org>
Date:   Mon Dec 12 00:45:30 2011 +0100

    TODO updated

 TODO |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index f17bbab..2a32187 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -3,35 +3,63 @@ TODO
 See also the Roadmap:
 	http://projects.gnome.org/latexila/#roadmap
 
+The Roadmap is less detailed, but have a long-term view.
+The TODO is more detailed, but focus more on the short-term.
+
 LaTeXila 2.4
 ============
 
-- Migrate to GTK+ 3.0
-  I wanted to make the migration for the 2.2 release but GtkSourceView 3.0 have removed the
-  gtk_source_completion_info_set_sizing() function.
-  Also, GTK 3 widgets are a lot bigger, it doesn't fit well with LaTeXila.
+- Do not migrate to GTK+ 3 [done]
+	It's more work than expected. Unless there is a motivated contributor,
+	(see the gnome-3 branch) the next 2.x versions of LaTeXila will continue
+	to use GTK+ 2.
 
+	For people using GNOME 3, I think it's not an important issue.
 
-LaTeXila â 2.4
-==============
+	The plan is to do the migration to both a gedit plugin and (obviously)
+	to GTK+ 3 at the same time for LaTeXila 3.0 (when gedit supports profiles).
+
+- Possibility to compile an unsaved LaTeX file, to test easily some code without
+  the need to save it in a temporary file that we have to delete just after the test,
+  and that we don't delete anyway.
+
+  The unsaved file would simply be saved somewhere in /tmp/.
 
 - Completion:
-	- show details by default
 	- complete placeholders (\ref, \cite, ...)
 	  (take into account all *.tex, *.bib, ... files of the project)
-	- Insert an image easily. Instead of a wizzard, the approach is to have very good
-	  completion of \begin{figure}[here], \includegraphics[here]{and here}, and automatically
-	  complete the label with the filename of the image.
+
+
+LaTeXila â 2.4
+==============
+
+- Completion:
+	- show details by default (now we have to click on the button to see
+	  the details)
+
+	- Insert an image easily. Instead of a wizzard, the approach is to:
+		- have very good completion of:
+			- \begin{figure}[here]
+			- \includegraphics[here]{and here}
+		- automatically complete the label with the filename of the image
+
+	  A big disadvantage of a wizzard is: how to modify easily the image afterwards?
+	  Generally, in this case, the user deletes the LaTeX code and re-run the wizzardâ
 
 (-) Structure:
 	- Select the current section or item when the document cursor moves
 
-	- Update on the fly the structure when the document is modified. An item can be inserted,
-	  deleted or modified. The simplest way I think is to re-run the parsing only on the modified
-	  lines (with a lower and upper bounds) every 2 seconds for example. This way, we simply
-	  delete all items between the two bounds, and the parsing will re-add them correctly.
+	- Update on the fly the structure when the document is modified.
+	  An item can be inserted, deleted or modified.
+	  The simplest way I think is to re-run the parsing only on the modified
+	  lines (with a lower and upper bounds) every 2 seconds for example.
+	  This way, we simply delete all items between the two bounds, and the
+	  parsing will re-add them correctly.
 
 (-) Edit toolbar: create a custom MenuToolButton:
-    Now the icon does nothing when we click on it, we must always click first on the arrow and then select the item.
-    It would be better if the icon is the last item used (and we can click on it).
-    A drawback is that the button would take more place, this can be a problem for small screens.
+	Now the icon does nothing when we click on it, we must always click
+	first on the arrow and then select the item. It would be better if
+	the icon is the last item used (and we can click on it).
+
+	A drawback is that the button would take more place, this can be a
+	problem for small screens.