[gmime] Updated tutorial

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj src gnome org>]

commit 719cd0f325b63a28eb7e95eebe54577d249f00ea
Author: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj gnome org>
Date:   Thu Oct 28 10:05:13 2010 -0400

    Updated tutorial

 docs/tutorial/gmime-tut.sgml |   16 +++++++---------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/docs/tutorial/gmime-tut.sgml b/docs/tutorial/gmime-tut.sgml
index c09390a..57b3c61 100644
--- a/docs/tutorial/gmime-tut.sgml
+++ b/docs/tutorial/gmime-tut.sgml
@@ -5,15 +5,15 @@
 <book id="gmime-tut">
 
   <bookinfo>
-    <title>GMime 2.0 tutorial</title>
-    <date>May 18, 2003</date>
+    <title>GMime 2.6 tutorial</title>
+    <date>Oct 28, 2010</date>
     <authorgroup>
       <author>
 	<firstname>Jeffrey</firstname>
 	<surname>Stedfast</surname>
 	<affiliation>
 	  <address>
-          <email>fejj ximian com</email>
+          <email>fejj gnome org</email>
         </address>
 	</affiliation>
       </author>
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ licenses or royalties.</para>
     
     <itemizedlist>
       <listitem>
-	<simpara>Jeffrey Stedfast <ulink url="mailto:fejj ximian com">fejj gnome org</ulink></simpara>
+	<simpara>Jeffrey Stedfast <ulink url="mailto:fejj gnome org">fejj gnome org</ulink></simpara>
       </listitem>
     </itemizedlist>
     
@@ -659,8 +659,6 @@ save_attachment (GMimePart *part)
 	content = g_mime_part_get_content_object (part);
 	g_mime_data_wrapper_write_to_stream (content, stream);
 	g_mime_stream_flush (stream);
-	
-	g_object_unref (content);
 	g_object_unref (stream);
 }
       </programlisting>
@@ -672,9 +670,9 @@ save_attachment (GMimePart *part)
       <literal>g_mime_data_wrapper_write_to_stream()</literal>. On
       fail, this function will return <literal>-1</literal>, otherwise
       it will return some positive value which will usually equate to
-      the number of bytes written (but not always); generally it's a
-      good idea to not rely on the returned value for anything other
-      than error-checking.</para>
+      the number of bytes written (but not always, due to filter
+      transformations); generally it's a good idea to not rely on the
+      returned value for anything other than error-checking.</para>
       
     </sect1>