[tracker] libtracker-db: Use atomic get_int instead of compare



commit 50dba92c96a7c9661e999a40e0086b387c7a8330
Author: Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be>
Date:   Wed May 26 13:03:40 2010 +0200

    libtracker-db: Use atomic get_int instead of compare
    
    Because we reset the flag now, it's not needed to set to 0 after
    the check

 src/libtracker-db/tracker-db-interface-sqlite.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/src/libtracker-db/tracker-db-interface-sqlite.c b/src/libtracker-db/tracker-db-interface-sqlite.c
index a65e151..20b2b13 100644
--- a/src/libtracker-db/tracker-db-interface-sqlite.c
+++ b/src/libtracker-db/tracker-db-interface-sqlite.c
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int
 check_interrupt (void *user_data)
 {
 	TrackerDBInterfaceSqlitePrivate *priv = user_data;
-	return g_atomic_int_compare_and_exchange (&priv->interrupt, 1, 0);
+	return g_atomic_int_get (&priv->interrupt);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ tracker_db_cursor_sqlite_iter_next (TrackerDBCursor *cursor,
 	if (!priv->finished) {
 		guint result;
 
-		if (g_atomic_int_compare_and_exchange (&iface_priv->interrupt, 1, 0)) {
+		if (g_atomic_int_get (&iface_priv->interrupt) == 1) {
 			result = SQLITE_INTERRUPT;
 			sqlite3_reset (priv->stmt);
 		} else {



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]