[gnomeweb-wml] Add IRC meeting log for 2009-05-06.
- From: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes src gnome org>
- To: svn-commits-list gnome org
- Subject: [gnomeweb-wml] Add IRC meeting log for 2009-05-06.
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:08:38 -0400 (EDT)
commit fad2f787cf82881bc18324938ed4a3edad853990
Author: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
Date: Thu May 7 07:07:30 2009 -0400
Add IRC meeting log for 2009-05-06.
---
projects.gnome.org/evolution/ChangeLog | 6 +
projects.gnome.org/evolution/developer.shtml | 4 +-
.../evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.shtml | 154 ++++++++++++++++++++
.../evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.txt | 139 ++++++++++++++++++
.../evolution/meeting-logs/Makefile.am | 1 +
projects.gnome.org/evolution/meetings.shtml | 5 +-
6 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/ChangeLog b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/ChangeLog
index 97d2162..e339ca8 100644
--- a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/ChangeLog
+++ b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2009-05-06 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
+
+ * developer.shtml:
+ * meetings.shtml:
+ Add IRC meeting log for 2009-05-06.
+
2009-05-04 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
* download.shtml:
diff --git a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/developer.shtml b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/developer.shtml
index 8c7b8c1..5b43c5e 100644
--- a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/developer.shtml
+++ b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/developer.shtml
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
<div class="split-half">
<ul>
+ <li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-05-06.shtml">2009-05-06</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-04-29.shtml">2009-04-29</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-04-22.shtml">2009-04-22</a></li>
<li>2009-04-15 (no meeting)</li>
@@ -79,7 +80,6 @@
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-02-25.shtml">2009-02-25</a></li>
<li>2009-02-18 (no meeting)</li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-02-11.shtml">2009-02-11</a></li>
- <li>2009-02-04 (no meeting)</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"> </div>
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
<div class="split-half">
<ul>
+ <li>2009-02-04 (no meeting)</li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-01-28.shtml">2009-01-28</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-01-21.shtml">2009-01-21</a></li>
<li>2008-01-14 (no meeting)</li>
@@ -101,7 +102,6 @@
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2008-11-26.shtml">2008-11-26</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2008-11-19.shtml">2008-11-19</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2008-11-12.shtml">2008-11-12</a></li>
- <li><a href="meeting-logs/2008-11-05.shtml">2008-11-05</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
diff --git a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.shtml b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.shtml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f913bf5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.shtml
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+<!--#set var="title" value="IRC Team Meeting - May 6, 2009"-->
+<!--#set var="section" value="developer"-->
+<!--#include virtual="../head.shtml"-->
+
+<h1>IRC Team Meeting - May 6, 2009</h1>
+<div class="irclog">
+<p id="tMay 06 06:04:21" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:04:21" class="time">May 06 06:04</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Hello everyone</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:04:43" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:04:43" class="time">May 06 06:04</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">we had 2.27.1 tarball out on Monday, our first unstable release on 2.27.x cycle</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:05:12" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:05:12" class="time">May 06 06:05</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">and now on, Im expecting mbarnes|away to merge his KB is small chunks :-)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:05:37" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:05:37" class="time">May 06 06:05</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">and I would be merging my Anjal patches on stable/trunk this week</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:05:48" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:05:48" class="time">May 06 06:05</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">really on stable too?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:05:51" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:05:51" class="time">May 06 06:05</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">otherwise, my tasks go so deep in Anjal for the next 3 weeks atleast</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:05:54" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:05:54" class="time">May 06 06:05</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, yeah</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:05:59" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:05:59" class="time">May 06 06:05</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">isn't it rather feature or something under freeze?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:02" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:02" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, that was my question last week</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:11" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:11" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, it won't be adding any features</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:23" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:23" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">just some apis for Evolution and EDS</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:24" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:24" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">strange, I missed that question, hrm</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:28" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:28" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #818144"><jony></span> <span class="text">srag, we may have to look for any strings .. that may be a issue .. </span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:41" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:41" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">jony, right, I dont think it would add much</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:48" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:48" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #854685"><abharath></span> <span class="text">srag: auto-filling your server details ain't a feature??</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:48" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:48" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">apart from the existing ones</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:51" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:51" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">srag, api adding? or api change?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:06:58" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:06:58" class="time">May 06 06:06</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">abharath, no ;-)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:04" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:04" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, some new apis</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:07" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:07" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #854685"><abharath></span> <span class="text">okies :D</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:07" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:07" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">no changes</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:19" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:19" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">abharath, it would be transparent</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:20" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:20" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">srag, anyway, go the safe side, master only</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:38" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:38" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, right, but these shouldn't harm the evo's execution path</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:47" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:47" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">wanna bet?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:52" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:52" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">meaning, Evo shouldn't have much harm, due to these changes</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:55" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:55" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #854685"><abharath></span> <span class="text">haha</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:07:57" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:07:57" class="time">May 06 06:07</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, no, ;-)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:08" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:08" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">one harm is enough, ask seb128 ;)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:08" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:08" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">anyways, moving ahead</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:18" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:18" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">abharath, anything to share with us ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:20" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:20" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, whatz taht ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:33" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:33" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">not me, ask seb128 ;)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:34" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:34" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #854685"><abharath></span> <span class="text">srag: nope nothing much</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:37" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:37" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, seb128 ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:45" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:45" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">what?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:08:45" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:08:45" class="time">May 06 06:08</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Fridrich, anything to share with us ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:01" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:01" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">seb128, pushing new things to stable</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:05" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:05" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #8c4a4a"><Fridrich></span> <span class="text">srag: my children, for holiday, if you want</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:09" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:09" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">that's not a good idea</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:12" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:12" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">:)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:19" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:19" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">jkerihuel, anything to share with us ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:23" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:23" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, we can discuss it out.</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:28" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:28" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">why not you don't start by trying to make stable usable?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:29" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:29" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #4b904b"><kerihuel></span> <span class="text">srag: nothing this week</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:31" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:31" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">right</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:35" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:35" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #8c4a4a"><Fridrich></span> <span class="text">just that evo 2.26.1 with all the up-2-date gnome stack is built in my repo</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:38" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:38" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">thx</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:50" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:50" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Fridrich, awesome, do you have a setup.exe ready ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:09:54" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:09:54" class="time">May 06 06:09</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">we must host it somewhere</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:10:18" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:10:18" class="time">May 06 06:10</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #8c4a4a"><Fridrich></span> <span class="text">srag: no, I never have setup.exe, only evolution-%version.msi but did not do that as for now</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:10:32" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:10:32" class="time">May 06 06:10</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Fridrich, that would also do :-)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:10:40" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:10:40" class="time">May 06 06:10</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">we need to have the installers hosted somewhere</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:10:49" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:10:49" class="time">May 06 06:10</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #854685"><abharath></span> <span class="text">Fridrich: now that I have merged all your patches to master a .27.1 should be ok :D</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:10:52" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:10:52" class="time">May 06 06:10</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Fridrich, just a discussion that popped out, while chatting with michael</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:10:55" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:10:55" class="time">May 06 06:10</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #818144"><jony></span> <span class="text">srag, why not gnome ftp ? </span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:11:06" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:11:06" class="time">May 06 06:11</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Fridrich, we may not have the bonobo port for EDS/ once dbus merge is done</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:11:29" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:11:29" class="time">May 06 06:11</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">the cost of carrying around bonobo would be more than finishing dbus on windows ;-)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:11:32" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:11:32" class="time">May 06 06:11</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #8c4a4a"><Fridrich></span> <span class="text">srag: the problem is that dbus4win is for the while a lot of talk only</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:11:48" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:11:48" class="time">May 06 06:11</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">lakhil, anything to share with us </span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:11:48" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:11:48" class="time">May 06 06:11</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #4d4d93"><lakhil></span> <span class="text">srag, nothing much ..</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:11:54" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:11:54" class="time">May 06 06:11</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Fridrich, oh, we can take it offline wiht michael</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:12:00" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:12:00" class="time">May 06 06:12</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">mcrha, anything to share with us ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:12:23" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:12:23" class="time">May 06 06:12</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">following the group, nothing special, last week passed too quickly here</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:12:32" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:12:32" class="time">May 06 06:12</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">:)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:12:40" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:12:40" class="time">May 06 06:12</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, anything to share with us ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:01" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:01" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">I'm a bit concerned about the stable versions quality</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:16" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:16" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, oh</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:17" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:17" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">nobody in the hacker team is using stable</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:31" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:31" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">hacker-team = us ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:34" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:34" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">2.26.1 is not usable for many users and most of replies are "it works on trunk"</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:35" class="action"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:35" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> *srag is on 2.26.1</p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:36" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:36" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">yes</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:43" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:43" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #8c4a4a"><Fridrich></span> <span class="text">yeah, on win32 too, I have subjective impression that it is a bit more unstable then 2.24.5 wa</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:13:49" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:13:49" class="time">May 06 06:13</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">well you are busy on anjal apparently</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:01" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:01" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, but I still use evolution for mails</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:13" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:13" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">it's not possible to edit recurrent events in calendar on 2.26.1 for example</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:13" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:13" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, if you have the bugs, just lemme know</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:28" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:28" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, the one you gave last week ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:31" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:31" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">seems it's fixed in git now but nobody rolled a tarball and it took me a week of pings to chen to know that</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:37" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:37" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">yes</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:45" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:45" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #8c4a4a"><Fridrich></span> <span class="text">and given the dbus stuff, I will have to stay with 2.26.x for the while in win32</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:14:56" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:14:56" class="time">May 06 06:14</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Fridrich, lets discuss it later</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:15:20" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:15:20" class="time">May 06 06:15</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">which means most distributions are shipping an evolution version where the calendar destroy recurrent events when trying to edit those</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:15:41" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:15:41" class="time">May 06 06:15</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">or display those wrongly on the calendar view</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:15:45" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:15:45" class="time">May 06 06:15</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">ok</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:15:53" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:15:53" class="time">May 06 06:15</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">was it a regression from 2.26.0 ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:15:56" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:15:56" class="time">May 06 06:15</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">or 2.24.x ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:16:04" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:16:04" class="time">May 06 06:16</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">it was not buggy in 2.24 for sure</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:16:10" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:16:10" class="time">May 06 06:16</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">dunno about 2.26.0</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:16:12" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:16:12" class="time">May 06 06:16</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">it would be bad, if stable was neglected while commiting to 2.27.x</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:16:21" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:16:21" class="time">May 06 06:16</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">is that the case?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:16:24" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:16:24" class="time">May 06 06:16</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">yes</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:16:35" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:16:35" class="time">May 06 06:16</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">one issue with displaying it "backend busy" when generating instances. when that happen, no items are shown</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:16:36" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:16:36" class="time">May 06 06:16</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">thatz not fair, and I understand</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:17:06" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:17:06" class="time">May 06 06:17</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, atleast, when we review patches, anything that is not risky, and no UI changes, is always recommended for stable</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:17:07" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:17:07" class="time">May 06 06:17</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">and it seems than most hackers don't have a 2.26 running to look at those issue</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:17:14" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:17:14" class="time">May 06 06:17</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">I donno what happened here..</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:17:27" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:17:27" class="time">May 06 06:17</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">ie chen had to do a 2.26 build to look at the issue and didn't get it because he used git and not tarballs still</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:17:56" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:17:56" class="time">May 06 06:17</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">srag: well in this case the fix is in git but there is no tarball which means most user still get the bug</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:18:16" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:18:16" class="time">May 06 06:18</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">seb128, did you verify the fix helped?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:18:22" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:18:22" class="time">May 06 06:18</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">mcrha: yes</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:18:27" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:18:27" class="time">May 06 06:18</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">ok</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:18:35" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:18:35" class="time">May 06 06:18</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">I just get a one hour shift now which is probably a different issue</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:18:44" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:18:44" class="time">May 06 06:18</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">but events are edited correctly</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:18:49" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:18:49" class="time">May 06 06:18</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, we make tarballs for very critical things..</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:18:56" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:18:56" class="time">May 06 06:18</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">apart from the regular cycles for stables</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:19:07" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:19:07" class="time">May 06 06:19</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">I will backport the fix to ubuntu</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:19:10" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:19:10" class="time">May 06 06:19</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">if it was critical enough, I should be informed... </span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:19:21" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:19:21" class="time">May 06 06:19</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">otherwise, its gonna get difficult :(</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:19:30" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:19:30" class="time">May 06 06:19</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">seb128, "Adjust for daylight saving time"? should be checked</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:19:31" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:19:31" class="time">May 06 06:19</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">but having evolution calendar not being able to edit a recurrent is sort of a showstopper</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:19:51" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:19:51" class="time">May 06 06:19</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">mcrha: yes</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:20:13" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:20:13" class="time">May 06 06:20</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">ok</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:20:19" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:20:19" class="time">May 06 06:20</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">srag: it's just that it's hard to "sell" evolution to users when basic things as editing calendar events is not working</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:20:28" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:20:28" class="time">May 06 06:20</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, I understand</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:21:01" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:21:01" class="time">May 06 06:21</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">seb128, by the way, I wouldn't expect the patch there be of a help, as it was, from my point of view, rather a rewrite, not fix of something concrete</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:21:15" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:21:15" class="time">May 06 06:21</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, I can take some measures, and lets see</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:21:22" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:21:22" class="time">May 06 06:21</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">sorry for the ranting</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:21:35" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:21:35" class="time">May 06 06:21</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">seb128, its fine, but with a small team and a building pressure for every one, things are getting tough</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:21:40" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:21:40" class="time">May 06 06:21</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">right</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:21:54" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:21:54" class="time">May 06 06:21</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">but you should focus some efforts on make stable version work correctly imho</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:22:00" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:22:00" class="time">May 06 06:22</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">rather than rush on new cracks</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:22:12" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:22:12" class="time">May 06 06:22</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">:)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:22:12" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:22:12" class="time">May 06 06:22</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">because otherwise you will not have lot of users left running your software</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:22:22" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:22:22" class="time">May 06 06:22</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">sure.</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:22:54" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:22:54" class="time">May 06 06:22</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">it might be even harder with all the gnome3 rewrites</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:23:04" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:23:04" class="time">May 06 06:23</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">:)</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:23:17" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:23:17" class="time">May 06 06:23</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">yeah ...</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:23:35" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:23:35" class="time">May 06 06:23</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">anyway enough ranting</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:23:35" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:23:35" class="time">May 06 06:23</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">seb128, scary that you?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:23:42" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:23:42" class="time">May 06 06:23</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">but such issues damage the evolution reputation</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:24:05" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:24:05" class="time">May 06 06:24</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #488888"><seb128></span> <span class="text">mcrha: no, distros can still keep 2.26 as a stable version until newer version fell stable enough</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:24:31" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:24:31" class="time">May 06 06:24</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">ok.</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:24:33" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:24:33" class="time">May 06 06:24</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #42427e"><mcrha></span> <span class="text">yeah, ok, then it scary at least me</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:24:35" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:24:35" class="time">May 06 06:24</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">anything else to duscuss ?</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:24:58" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:24:58" class="time">May 06 06:24</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">s/duscuss/discuss</span></p>
+<p id="tMay 06 06:25:14" class="comment"><a href="#tMay 06 06:25:14" class="time">May 06 06:25</a> <span class="nick" style="color: #407a40"><srag></span> <span class="text">Ok guys, see you all next week.</span></p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="generatedby">
+<p>Logged by <a href="mailto:mbarnes redhat com">Matthew Barnes</a> (mbarnes)</p>
+<p>Generated by irclog2html.py 2.5 by <a href="mailto:marius pov lt">Marius Gedminas</a>
+ - find it at <a href="http://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/";>mg.pov.lt</a>!</p>
+</div>
+
+<!--#include virtual="../foot.shtml"-->
+
diff --git a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.txt b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c992feb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-05-06.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+May 06 06:04:21 <srag> Hello everyone
+May 06 06:04:43 <srag> we had 2.27.1 tarball out on Monday, our first unstable release on 2.27.x cycle
+May 06 06:05:12 <srag> and now on, Im expecting mbarnes|away to merge his KB is small chunks :-)
+May 06 06:05:37 <srag> and I would be merging my Anjal patches on stable/trunk this week
+May 06 06:05:48 <mcrha> really on stable too?
+May 06 06:05:51 <srag> otherwise, my tasks go so deep in Anjal for the next 3 weeks atleast
+May 06 06:05:54 <srag> mcrha, yeah
+May 06 06:05:59 <mcrha> isn't it rather feature or something under freeze?
+May 06 06:06:02 <srag> mcrha, that was my question last week
+May 06 06:06:11 <srag> mcrha, it won't be adding any features
+May 06 06:06:23 <srag> just some apis for Evolution and EDS
+May 06 06:06:24 <mcrha> strange, I missed that question, hrm
+May 06 06:06:28 <jony> srag, we may have to look for any strings .. that may be a issue ..
+May 06 06:06:41 <srag> jony, right, I dont think it would add much
+May 06 06:06:48 <abharath> srag: auto-filling your server details ain't a feature??
+May 06 06:06:48 <srag> apart from the existing ones
+May 06 06:06:51 <mcrha> srag, api adding? or api change?
+May 06 06:06:58 <srag> abharath, no ;-)
+May 06 06:07:04 <srag> mcrha, some new apis
+May 06 06:07:07 <abharath> okies :D
+May 06 06:07:07 <srag> no changes
+May 06 06:07:19 <srag> abharath, it would be transparent
+May 06 06:07:20 <mcrha> srag, anyway, go the safe side, master only
+May 06 06:07:38 <srag> mcrha, right, but these shouldn't harm the evo's execution path
+May 06 06:07:47 <mcrha> wanna bet?
+May 06 06:07:52 <srag> meaning, Evo shouldn't have much harm, due to these changes
+May 06 06:07:55 <abharath> haha
+May 06 06:07:57 <srag> mcrha, no, ;-)
+May 06 06:08:08 <mcrha> one harm is enough, ask seb128 ;)
+May 06 06:08:08 <srag> anyways, moving ahead
+May 06 06:08:18 <srag> abharath, anything to share with us ?
+May 06 06:08:20 <srag> mcrha, whatz taht ?
+May 06 06:08:33 <mcrha> not me, ask seb128 ;)
+May 06 06:08:34 <abharath> srag: nope nothing much
+May 06 06:08:37 <srag> mcrha, seb128 ?
+May 06 06:08:45 <seb128> what?
+May 06 06:08:45 <srag> Fridrich, anything to share with us ?
+May 06 06:09:01 <mcrha> seb128, pushing new things to stable
+May 06 06:09:05 <Fridrich> srag: my children, for holiday, if you want
+May 06 06:09:09 <seb128> that's not a good idea
+May 06 06:09:12 <srag> :)
+May 06 06:09:19 <srag> jkerihuel, anything to share with us ?
+May 06 06:09:23 <srag> seb128, we can discuss it out.
+May 06 06:09:28 <seb128> why not you don't start by trying to make stable usable?
+May 06 06:09:29 <kerihuel> srag: nothing this week
+May 06 06:09:31 <seb128> right
+May 06 06:09:35 <Fridrich> just that evo 2.26.1 with all the up-2-date gnome stack is built in my repo
+May 06 06:09:38 <srag> thx
+May 06 06:09:50 <srag> Fridrich, awesome, do you have a setup.exe ready ?
+May 06 06:09:54 <srag> we must host it somewhere
+May 06 06:10:18 <Fridrich> srag: no, I never have setup.exe, only evolution-%version.msi but did not do that as for now
+May 06 06:10:32 <srag> Fridrich, that would also do :-)
+May 06 06:10:40 <srag> we need to have the installers hosted somewhere
+May 06 06:10:49 <abharath> Fridrich: now that I have merged all your patches to master a .27.1 should be ok :D
+May 06 06:10:52 <srag> Fridrich, just a discussion that popped out, while chatting with michael
+May 06 06:10:55 <jony> srag, why not gnome ftp ?
+May 06 06:11:06 <srag> Fridrich, we may not have the bonobo port for EDS/ once dbus merge is done
+May 06 06:11:29 <srag> the cost of carrying around bonobo would be more than finishing dbus on windows ;-)
+May 06 06:11:32 <Fridrich> srag: the problem is that dbus4win is for the while a lot of talk only
+May 06 06:11:48 <srag> lakhil, anything to share with us
+May 06 06:11:48 <lakhil> srag, nothing much ..
+May 06 06:11:54 <srag> Fridrich, oh, we can take it offline wiht michael
+May 06 06:12:00 <srag> mcrha, anything to share with us ?
+May 06 06:12:23 <mcrha> following the group, nothing special, last week passed too quickly here
+May 06 06:12:32 <srag> :)
+May 06 06:12:40 <srag> seb128, anything to share with us ?
+May 06 06:13:01 <seb128> I'm a bit concerned about the stable versions quality
+May 06 06:13:16 <srag> seb128, oh
+May 06 06:13:17 <seb128> nobody in the hacker team is using stable
+May 06 06:13:31 <srag> hacker-team = us ?
+May 06 06:13:34 <seb128> 2.26.1 is not usable for many users and most of replies are "it works on trunk"
+May 06 06:13:35 * srag is on 2.26.1
+May 06 06:13:36 <seb128> yes
+May 06 06:13:43 <Fridrich> yeah, on win32 too, I have subjective impression that it is a bit more unstable then 2.24.5 wa
+May 06 06:13:49 <seb128> well you are busy on anjal apparently
+May 06 06:14:01 <srag> seb128, but I still use evolution for mails
+May 06 06:14:13 <seb128> it's not possible to edit recurrent events in calendar on 2.26.1 for example
+May 06 06:14:13 <srag> seb128, if you have the bugs, just lemme know
+May 06 06:14:28 <srag> seb128, the one you gave last week ?
+May 06 06:14:31 <seb128> seems it's fixed in git now but nobody rolled a tarball and it took me a week of pings to chen to know that
+May 06 06:14:37 <seb128> yes
+May 06 06:14:45 <Fridrich> and given the dbus stuff, I will have to stay with 2.26.x for the while in win32
+May 06 06:14:56 <srag> Fridrich, lets discuss it later
+May 06 06:15:20 <seb128> which means most distributions are shipping an evolution version where the calendar destroy recurrent events when trying to edit those
+May 06 06:15:41 <seb128> or display those wrongly on the calendar view
+May 06 06:15:45 <srag> ok
+May 06 06:15:53 <srag> was it a regression from 2.26.0 ?
+May 06 06:15:56 <srag> or 2.24.x ?
+May 06 06:16:04 <seb128> it was not buggy in 2.24 for sure
+May 06 06:16:10 <seb128> dunno about 2.26.0
+May 06 06:16:12 <srag> it would be bad, if stable was neglected while commiting to 2.27.x
+May 06 06:16:21 <srag> is that the case?
+May 06 06:16:24 <seb128> yes
+May 06 06:16:35 <mcrha> one issue with displaying it "backend busy" when generating instances. when that happen, no items are shown
+May 06 06:16:36 <srag> thatz not fair, and I understand
+May 06 06:17:06 <srag> seb128, atleast, when we review patches, anything that is not risky, and no UI changes, is always recommended for stable
+May 06 06:17:07 <seb128> and it seems than most hackers don't have a 2.26 running to look at those issue
+May 06 06:17:14 <srag> I donno what happened here..
+May 06 06:17:27 <seb128> ie chen had to do a 2.26 build to look at the issue and didn't get it because he used git and not tarballs still
+May 06 06:17:56 <seb128> srag: well in this case the fix is in git but there is no tarball which means most user still get the bug
+May 06 06:18:16 <mcrha> seb128, did you verify the fix helped?
+May 06 06:18:22 <seb128> mcrha: yes
+May 06 06:18:27 <mcrha> ok
+May 06 06:18:35 <seb128> I just get a one hour shift now which is probably a different issue
+May 06 06:18:44 <seb128> but events are edited correctly
+May 06 06:18:49 <srag> seb128, we make tarballs for very critical things..
+May 06 06:18:56 <srag> apart from the regular cycles for stables
+May 06 06:19:07 <seb128> I will backport the fix to ubuntu
+May 06 06:19:10 <srag> if it was critical enough, I should be informed...
+May 06 06:19:21 <srag> otherwise, its gonna get difficult :(
+May 06 06:19:30 <mcrha> seb128, "Adjust for daylight saving time"? should be checked
+May 06 06:19:31 <seb128> but having evolution calendar not being able to edit a recurrent is sort of a showstopper
+May 06 06:19:51 <seb128> mcrha: yes
+May 06 06:20:13 <mcrha> ok
+May 06 06:20:19 <seb128> srag: it's just that it's hard to "sell" evolution to users when basic things as editing calendar events is not working
+May 06 06:20:28 <srag> seb128, I understand
+May 06 06:21:01 <mcrha> seb128, by the way, I wouldn't expect the patch there be of a help, as it was, from my point of view, rather a rewrite, not fix of something concrete
+May 06 06:21:15 <srag> seb128, I can take some measures, and lets see
+May 06 06:21:22 <seb128> sorry for the ranting
+May 06 06:21:35 <srag> seb128, its fine, but with a small team and a building pressure for every one, things are getting tough
+May 06 06:21:40 <seb128> right
+May 06 06:21:54 <seb128> but you should focus some efforts on make stable version work correctly imho
+May 06 06:22:00 <seb128> rather than rush on new cracks
+May 06 06:22:12 <mcrha> :)
+May 06 06:22:12 <seb128> because otherwise you will not have lot of users left running your software
+May 06 06:22:22 <srag> sure.
+May 06 06:22:54 <mcrha> it might be even harder with all the gnome3 rewrites
+May 06 06:23:04 <srag> :)
+May 06 06:23:17 <seb128> yeah ...
+May 06 06:23:35 <seb128> anyway enough ranting
+May 06 06:23:35 <mcrha> seb128, scary that you?
+May 06 06:23:42 <seb128> but such issues damage the evolution reputation
+May 06 06:24:05 <seb128> mcrha: no, distros can still keep 2.26 as a stable version until newer version fell stable enough
+May 06 06:24:31 <srag> ok.
+May 06 06:24:33 <mcrha> yeah, ok, then it scary at least me
+May 06 06:24:35 <srag> anything else to duscuss ?
+May 06 06:24:58 <srag> s/duscuss/discuss
+May 06 06:25:14 <srag> Ok guys, see you all next week.
+
diff --git a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/Makefile.am b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/Makefile.am
index b776168..055a88b 100644
--- a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/Makefile.am
+++ b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/Makefile.am
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ urlpath = /evolution/meeting-logs
page_SCRIPTS=
page_DATA = \
+ 2009-05-06.shtml \
2009-04-29.shtml \
2009-04-22.shtml \
2009-04-08.shtml \
diff --git a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meetings.shtml b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meetings.shtml
index 20d645b..7c6f48d 100644
--- a/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meetings.shtml
+++ b/projects.gnome.org/evolution/meetings.shtml
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
<div class="split-half">
<ul>
+ <li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-05-06.shtml">2009-05-06</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-04-29.shtml">2009-04-29</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-04-22.shtml">2009-04-22</a></li>
<li>2009-04-15 (no meeting)</li>
@@ -27,12 +28,12 @@
<li>2009-03-25 (no meeting)</li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-03-18.shtml">2009-03-18</a></li>
<li>2009-03-11 (no meeting)</li>
- <li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-03-04.shtml">2009-03-04</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="split-half">
<ul>
+ <li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-03-04.shtml">2009-03-04</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-02-25.shtml">2009-02-25</a></li>
<li>2009-02-18 (no meeting)</li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-02-11.shtml">2009-02-11</a></li>
@@ -41,7 +42,7 @@
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-01-21.shtml">2009-01-21</a></li>
<li><a href="meeting-logs/2009-01-07.shtml">2009-01-07</a></li>
<li>2009-01-14 (no meeting)</li>
- <!-- Comment this when the lists are even. --><br>
+ <!-- Comment this when the lists are even. --><!--<br>-->
</ul>
</div>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
