Re: clutter batching
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: mahesh gawali <maheshgawali outlook com>
- Cc: "clutter-list gnome org" <clutter-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: clutter batching
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:25:23 +0000
Hi;
Test-state is a bit of a edge case: it's meant to be the model used to stress test Clutter (and Cogl). In reality, most of what it does is wrong and deprecated, but it provides us with a good baseline for the worst case scenario of Clitter usage. I don't regard the interactive test suite as a performance indicator, or as code that ought to be used by third party developers.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013, mahesh gawali wrote:
Salmokar,
I followed up with your post on COGL mailing list since I was also curious about cogl-batching.
Here's a response from Robert that might help you.
--
Mahesh
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:35:29 +0530
Subject: clutter batching
From:
salmokarjames gmail com
To:
clutter-list gnome orgHello,
While running the ./test-state test within clutter, and exporting COGL_DEBUG=batching , i am getting a lot of "len=1" output..
but within this bulk of "len=1" i also get this once in a while..
journal len = 24
clip stack batch len = 24
vbo offset batch len =24
and some times len = 48 , 72 etc..
so does that mean that batching is not being performed efficiently(or at all) because majority of the times the len =1?
and why the len varies from 1 to 24 to 72 once in a while? what does this actually mean? and is this test case suitable for batching..?
I am new to clutter development and help and explanation would benefit.
Thanks,
Kind regards,
Salmokar.
_______________________________________________
clutter-list mailing list
clutter-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/clutter-list
--
W:
http://www.emmanuelebassi.nameB:
http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]