dear alexey, you are right, this is still one of the major issues cheese still has. we are discussing ways to fix this on this bugreport: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564957 you are very welcome to join us there and give us some hints on what might be a good way to fix this. thanks a lot for your interest! daniel On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 22:14 +0200, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Hallo all, > > i get some time to paly with cheese again. Great app :D but still need > some love. > > Now to the problem: > most new webcam have big resolution, and it looks like it is much bigger > than not too old hardware can encode video in realtime. Even my not > really bad CPU (Intel Core2Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz) can't handle resolution > at 1600x1200 provided by my cam. This CPU can handle simple encoding > with 960x720, but can't do it with some effects enabled. And only at > 320x240 it work with effects OK. > The situation with netbooks (athom inside) is worse. > > I see, it is not really easy to make right choice, what resolution to > push. What do you thing about this? Is it possible to do some bench test > on first start and write it in config? Or use cpu profile based on speed > and instruction set? Any other ideas? > > Regards, > Alexey > > > _______________________________________________ > cheese-list mailing list > cheese-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/cheese-list -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org> http://www.dgsiegel.net gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part