On Mo, 2009-05-11 at 12:19 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:10 AM, <A J Delaney brighton ac uk> wrote: > > I hacked up a Cheese patch to support timelapse: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581997 > > However, I don't think this patch achieves timelapse in a sane way. So > > I've got a proposal as to how I think I should implement timelapse in a > > more sane manner. However, the patch shows that Cheese can successfully > > do timelapse. > > It's not a pretty solution. I think this sort of functionality belongs > in a proper gstreamer element. This would let it do other potentially > useful things like detect movement and only encode frames that are > significantly different or even add subtitles stream/overlay with date > and time. time lapse itself is probably not one of the targets cheese should aim to, however taking a series of photos could be of course. i think, if we are able to add that to cheese, and leave some configurations options in gconf, we can satisfy both targets. daniel > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part