Re: Cleanup for 1.0.50
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel gnu org>
- To: calendar-list gnome org
- CC: sopwith redhat com, vincent ldsol com
- Subject: Re: Cleanup for 1.0.50
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 08:07:42 -0500
[ Elliot, Vincent: Read details on package maintenance at bottom ]
> I've temporarily stopped my attempts to add snooze functionality to
> gnomecal (mentioned in an earlier message to the list). I was
> getting mysterious segfaults, so I figured it was safer to save the
> diff from my working directory, check out a fresh copy of the
> sources, and get back to it after the stable release.
Well, we do have a branch created for this in gnome-pim.
gnome-pim-1-0 is what is going to be shipped with GNOME 99Q4.
While HEAD is our cool new thing.
Could I look at your patch? I might be able to tell what the segfault
is.
> * Bug #1316 contains a patch which the submitter indicates fixes the
> problem (compilation on IRIX 6.x) but which does not seem to have yet
> been applied to CVS.
I do not know why I have not been getting those messages. The patch
looks very correct to me. I have applied this to HEAD and I am about
to do the same for gnome-pim-1-0 branch.
> * Is there a reason that the default button in the Event Editor is
> Cancel, rather than OK? I suspect that's at least partially to blame
> for bugs like #1472.
1472 is a gnome-terminal bug. Can you tell me which bug you were
looking at?
I have not been getting these errors as Federico is listed as the
maintainer, I need to find out a way to make me the maintainer.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]