|
Hi all,
I've appended a line of results to the tables that I posted to the list last week [0], and also attached the notebook. I've not yet been able to host these somewhere. See last weeks email ([0]) if you're struggling to open the notebook (the graphs have some fun interactive features). Results below: Averages of the show and build times of base-files/base-files.bst [1]: | Dates | Show (s) | Show with cache (s) | Build (s) | Show once built (s) | |-------------|----------|---------------------|-----------|---------------------| | 21/01-27/01 | 46.69 | 27.40 | 378.58 | 33.65 | | 28/01-03/02 | 46.36 | 27.35 | 383.83 | 33.49 | | 04-02-10/02 | 45.72 | 26.53 | 268.70 | 32.68 | | 11/02-17/02 | 43.07 | 24.04 | 228.94 | 30.13 | | 18/02-24/02 | 40.87 | 22.35 | 228.72 | 28.56 | Averages of the maximum memory usage for the show and build of base-files/base-files.bst: | Dates | Show (MB) | Show with cache (MB) | Build (MB) | Show once built (MB) | |-------------|-----------|----------------------|------------|----------------------| | 21/01-27/01 | 1084 | 1108 | 1109 | 1110 | | 28/01-03/02 | 1083 | 1108 | 1109 | 1110 | | 04-02-10/02 | 556 | 581 | 582 | 582 | | 11/02-17/02 | 403 | 425 | 425 | 426 | | 18/02-24/02 | 410 | 424 | 425 | 425 | It seems that the results in this table would suggest that there was significant improvement last week, however, from looking at the notebook that doesn't seem to be the case. I suspect last week's (11/02-17/02) averages were higher because they included calculating averages with data points from pre-!1131 (danielsilverstone-ct/further-optimisations [2]). The timings throughout last week seem to be pretty consistent. Hope you found this helpful. Thanks, James [0] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/buildstream-list/2019-February/msg00046.html [1] https://gitlab.com/jennis/benchmark_debian [2] https://gitlab.com/BuildStream/buildstream/merge_requests/1131 |
Attachment:
weekly_results.ipynb
Description: application/ipynb