Re: [BuildStream] Proposal: bst artifact subcommand group
- From: Jürg Billeter <j bitron ch>
- To: Paul Sherwood <paul sherwood codethink co uk>, Tristan Van Berkom <tristan vanberkom codethink co uk>
- Cc: BuildStream <buildstream-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [BuildStream] Proposal: bst artifact subcommand group
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:10:13 +0200
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 13:51 +0100, Paul Sherwood via Buildstream-list wrote:
On 2018-07-24 11:48, Tristan Van Berkom via Buildstream-list wrote:
<snip>
It was recently raised that we cannot determine the build date of an
existing artifact either[1], as it's not a part of artifact metadata,
this discussion evolved to proposing that we have a subgroup of CLI
commands for dealing with specific artifacts.
Perhaps a dumb question, but why isn't creation date of the artifact
file/archive good enough?
POSIX systems do not generally support creation/birth time metadata for
files, only modification, status change, and access times.
As such I'd like to propose the following, probably uncontroversial
enhancements:
o Add the build date to the artifact metadata, as a timezone neutral
unix timestamp (seconds since epoch in UTC).
For text-based formats such as artifact metadata, I would rather
recommend RFC 3339 (ISO8601-based).
Jürg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]