Re: Old discussions: OBS and integration

On 09/10/2011 12:21 AM, Javier Hernández Antúnez wrote:

2011/9/1 Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>

Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011, à 10:16 +0200, Piñeiro a écrit :
> Probably this is a good moment to talk again about an
> integration:

Hi all!

Sorry for the delay.

Technically, It's my first talk about it, but I'm interested in this so I've just subscribed to the build-brigade list. First of all, I'd like to know how's the state of this team, if is in active or not, etc.

Well, yes, the group is active. After all the jhbuild-buildbot integration is there, and the rest is about getting the buildbots running. Although it is true that here:

There are too munc red.

(And yes sorry, it is still pending that "send a mail for each build failure task")

API, give me some time for to compose a full detailed and constructive answer about this, we have been using buildbot for a similar solution for our distro-o-matic system at our company (Emergya) for many years. We use this solution for to auto-build packages and for to generate OS images (ie: Guadalinex, LinexSP, etc), but for debian-like distros and of course without obs. That's the reason I want to dive into our gnome-obs integration environment, what we need and then, to compose such a constructive answer.


Frederic, did you finally do something about this for the gnome 3 live images?
if not ...
Frederic and Vincent, how do you actually are packaging each recent released tarballs, by hand? If it's like this, maybe we can do something for to do that only by listening for new tags/tarballs. make sense?

And for to finish, maybe it's a good idea to move this thread completely to the build-brigade list and keep release-team list in peace, isn't it?

Done, I removed release-team from the CC.


Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]