Re: build.gnome.org
- From: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral igalia com>
- To: John Carr <john carr unrouted co uk>
- Cc: build-brigade-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: build.gnome.org
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:10:14 +0200
Hi John!
El mar, 22-04-2008 a las 22:13 +0100, John Carr escribió:
> Hi All
>
> Just a little status update.
>
> I've been looking at using a SOCKS Server/Client to get around the
> ports issue.
[...]
> I plan to do a test with the SOCKS5 code to see if my plan works, and
> then there are 2 paths i can take.
>
> (1) Use SOCKS5. There is code for client and server, but it means that
> the master will depend on proxy65. Note that my jhbuild moduleset
> should make it trivial to deploy anyway. We could also look at
> including the SOCKS part of the code directly, but i'm not sure of the
> copyright stuff.
If this SOCKS5 client/server code works for us then we can check both
options, but in principle, as you say, a jhbuild moduleset for the
buildbot would make this easy to handle.
> Unfortunately the SOCKS5 client has no copyright
> notice on it so we would need to contact him before we started
> deploying it
Yes, good point. Googling a little bit it looks like the person that
submitted that ticket is Daniel Henninger <jadestorm nc rr com>. I will
try to contact him.
> (2) Use SOCKS4. We'd be using the server that ships with twisted, but
> would have to roll our own client..
I think SOCKSv5 client/server is the best option if it works fine for
us, but I'll give you the final word on this, for you are the one
actually testing them :)
Iago
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]