Re: Brasero 2.27.91 release
- From: Pacho Ramos <pacho condmat1 ciencias uniovi es>
- To: Joerg Schilling <Joerg Schilling fokus fraunhofer de>
- Cc: brasero-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Brasero 2.27.91 release
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:24:28 +0200
El mié, 02-09-2009 a las 11:21 +0200, Joerg Schilling escribió:
> Denis Leroy <denis poolshark org> wrote:
> > On 09/01/2009 11:54 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Then you don't seem to know that a person from the Gnome project (Olav Vitters)
> > That seems hard to believe, really
> It is not important whether something is hard to believe.
> The sad fact is that it happned.
I am currently using brasero-2.26 with cdrtools 2.01.01_alpha57 under
Gentoo because mkisofs consumes less RAM that cdrkit one. Brasero works
fine with it but, please, take care that I am able to use it with
cdrtools because Gentoo still ships it, on the other hand, much
"popular" distributions like fedora, mandriva or ubuntu don't include
cdrtools, then, it's reasonable that brasero also supports other
backends like libburnia, cdrkit or cdrdao.
Maybe if you work a bit with the problems related with licensing... yes,
I know that you think that license is fine (I have already read that
topic in cdrtools webpage), but I think that would be better if all
(distributions and cdrtools upstream) could find a a point for reaching
a consensous that would allow to ship cdrtools even on distributions
with stricter licensing rules.
Please, don't think that I am blaming on you, I simply suggest this as a
cdrtools user since lots of years (since I was using it with xcdroast
] [Thread Prev