Re: Current status of OpenBSD BEAST

[Nedko Arnaudov <nedko users sourceforge net>]

Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> Any autoconf version that is available for OpenBSD is better for me.
> From others, the newer is better for me unless you think otherwise. So
> far I've not found autoconf related issues.

Just found that 2.52 (the one that is closest to 2.50 and is available
from OpenBSD ports) does not work for me. Here is tail of autogen.sh
output:

Running intltoolize...
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.in.in.clean       Wed Oct 17 16:15:24 2001
|+++ Makefile.in.in     Wed Oct 17 16:15:30 2001
--------------------------
Patching file po/Makefile.in.in using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 21 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #2 failed at 46.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 88 with fuzz 2 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #4 failed at 214.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 225 (offset -4 lines).
2 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to po/Makefile.in.in.rej
done
autoconf-2.52: tracing failed

This is against CVS HEAD latest (29 dec 2003)
autogen.sh still succeeds with autoconf 2.58
-- 
Nedko Arnaudov