Re: [Banshee-List] ANN: mono-upnp 0.1.0

[Nelson Marques <nmo marques gmail com>]

Bertrand,

Thanks for the prompt reply. Interesting stuff... either way I only
have mono-nunit available from our repositories. I've patched
mono-upnp to check for mono-nunit instead, all went fine. Package is
submitted and will go to Factory soon, so if the extension gets merged
with Banshee upstream, we're ready to deploy.

:)

Nm

2012/2/15 Bertrand Lorentz <bertrand lorentz gmail com>:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Nelson Marques <nmo marques gmail com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to ask one question, it's not the first time I'm running
>> across this... What is the upstream pkgconfig() call for 'nunit' ? In
>> several packages I've noticed that on openSUSE the right call would be
>> pkgconfig(mono-nunit), and many software uses pkgconfig(nunit).
>>
>> Anyone has some info about this ?
>
> I think mono provides its own copy of nunit, referenced by the
> mono-nunit.pc pkg-config file. Using nunit.pc gets you the regular,
> upstream nunit.
>
> When I was fiddling with the build of Mono.Upnp, I hesitated between
> the two, and went for referencing nunit in the .csproj, as there's a
> better chance of that working when building with .NET on Windows. As
> the autotools stuff is mostly generated by MonoDevelop, that's where
> the pkgconfig(nunit) call comes from.
>
> I just also realized that the Banshee autotools stuff checks for both,
> and we sidestep the .NET question by not building the tests on
> Windows...
>
> --
> Bertrand Lorentz
> _______________________________________________
> banshee-list mailing list
> banshee-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/banshee-list  (unsubscribe here)



-- 
Nelson Marques

/* http://www.marques.so
  nmo marques gmail com */