Re: [Banshee-List] browser patch?

[Richard Eldred <reldred gmail com>]

Throwing in my vote for the browser as well. I typically always listen
to full albums, and the browser makes that a lot easier. Definatly
something that would get me using Banshee over Rhythmbox.

On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:37 +0100, Michael Monreal wrote:
> banshee-list gnome org, sjoeboo sjoeboo com schrieb am 25.02.06 17:25:42:
> > 
> > so, whatever happened to the browser patch that was floating around a
> > while ago? is it ever going to be included? a plugin? i used it a while
> > aog and it seemed to work just fine, and made manage my large collection
> > far easier. to be honest, this single reason is the one thing that keeps
> > me using rhythmbox sometimes instead of banshee all the time. 
> 
> I have to second that again... I mainly use banshee now after setting up a few nice playlists for every day use, but when I feel like listening to something different, I start up rhythmbox instead, because navigating artist/album/title is so much faster. If only *some* version of the browser patch would finally make it into head for people to finish/polish. It would be a shame to see e.g. the next ubuntu with a version of banshee without browser...
> 
> So +1 for the browser
> 
> -Michael
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
> Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Banshee-list mailing list
> Banshee-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/banshee-list